Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Amargosa Land Trust

Amargosa Land Trust (California) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $645,868 to it, the largest being Conservation Lands Foundation ($352,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$396k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$646k
Net assets
$671k
4/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 40%
01What it does

What Amargosa Land Trust does

Mission

Working toward a sustainable future for the Amargosa River and Basin through science stewardship and advocacy. Protection of the Land Water and Beauty of the Amargosa Region located on the east side of Death Valley National Park.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Hydrology Analysis Tecopa Monitoring

    $14,009 spent$4,754 earned by the program
    6% of program spending
  2. Administration of educational programs and stewardship activities including workshops trail maintenance and advocating for the Amargosa region and its inhabitants.

    $228,603 spent
    94% of program spending
  3. Not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $242,612.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($298k) Expenses 100 ($351k) Net assets 100 ($221k)2018 Revenue 148 ($441k) Expenses 121 ($426k) Net assets 99 ($220k)2019 Revenue 66 ($196k) Expenses 64 ($225k) Net assets 101 ($224k)2020 Revenue 117 ($347k) Expenses 53 ($187k) Net assets 172 ($380k)2021 Revenue 26 ($77k) Expenses 14 ($48k) Net assets 175 ($388k)2022 Revenue 31 ($94k) Expenses 33 ($117k) Net assets 173 ($383k)2023 Revenue 77 ($230k) Expenses 45 ($158k) Net assets 205 ($453k)2024 Revenue 124 ($370k) Expenses 69 ($242k) Net assets 262 ($579k)2025 Revenue 133 ($396k) Expenses 86 ($303k) Net assets 304 ($671k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (133)Expenses (86)Net assets (304)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $454k to $581k (+28%).

$414k
$299k
$284k
$392k
$399k
$397k
$454k
$581k
$676k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 66% · 2018 52% · 2019 42% · 2020 66% · 2021 22% · 2022 2% · 2023 1% · 2024 0% · 2025 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of Amargosa Land Trust’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$53k
’17
$15k
’18
−$29k
’19
$160k
’20
$29k
’21
−$23k
’22
$72k
’23
$129k
’24
$93k
’25
19
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Mason Voehl

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed91099910111212
Joined·+2+1+2+3+2+1+1+1
No longer listed·12231001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $55k → $50k.

4 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Amargosa Land Trust’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Amargosa Land Trust leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Amargosa Land Trust.

55%
largest funder
77%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 73% · 2018 71% · 2019 72% · 2020 58% · 2021 58% · 2022 53% · 2023 50% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of Amargosa Land Trust's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 33% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Amargosa Land Trust draws 88% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 4 states in all.

OH
CA
CO
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $37k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Amargosa Land Trust holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 3,693 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin23% · above the median
Months of reserve18.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding Amargosa Land Trust receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $50k on record.

Federal$50k
grants $50kcontracts $0
17
18
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$50k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Amargosa Land Trust

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 16%Fundraising 4%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Amargosa Land Trust: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Amargosa Land Trust?
Amargosa Land Trust (California) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $645,868 to it, the largest being Conservation Lands Foundation ($352,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Amargosa Land Trust have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $645,868 in grants to Amargosa Land Trust, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Amargosa Land Trust?
Conservation Lands Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $352,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Amargosa Land Trust find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Amargosa Land →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing