How much did John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

art

2021

art

2022

—

2023

financial aidunderservedaid sicksick disableddisabled needyartartists

2024

financial aidhomelessunderservedartsartartists

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $68k
$10k–50k15 grants · $205k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

University of Notre Dame (President's Circle)$25,000
St John the Evangelist$20,000
Habitat for Hummanity$20,000
Guadalupe Center$20,000
Catholic Charities Diocese of Venice$15,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$15,000
St John the Evangelist$10,100
Forecast Public Art$10,000
Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida$10,000
Hope for Haiti$10,000
Catholic Charities Twin Cities$10,000
Cancer Alliance Network$10,000
United Arts Collier$10,000
Avow Hospice$10,000
Artis - Naples$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $414k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 20% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

John B & Nancy K Dee Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 9.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.6M · 29 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.6M

$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%

+273%

Still filing today

45%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

St Jude Children's Research Hospital
8× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +74%
CW
Concern Worldwide (US) Inc
7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +79%
UW
United Way of Collier County
7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +27%

Funded once

SJ
St John the Evangelist Catholic Church
one grant, 2017 · $20k
CC
Catholic Charities of St Paul & Minneapolis
one grant, 2023 · $10k
SM
St Matthews Housegraduated
one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +273%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and miami-dade counties.

—

Volusiaflagler County Coalition for

The mission of the volusia/flagler county coalition for the homeless is to coordinate resources to assist families and individuals at risk of homelessness or currently experiencing homelessness to maintain or regain self-sufficiency.

Human Services

Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

—

Camillus Health Concern Inc

Camillus health concern's mission is to follow the teachings of jesus christ and in the compassionate hospitality of st. john of god. camillus health concern strives to deliver comprehensive health care services with the highest quality…

—

Collier Health Services Inc

To provide quality healthcare accessible to everyone in our community.

Health

The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Provides health, human, & community services for the terminally ill and their families.

Human Services

St Anne's Nursing Center

The organization provides nursing and assisted care to individuals of all faiths regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Hospice Foundation of Palm Beach County

Palm beach island hospice foundation was established exclusively to support the programs, services and activities which further comprehensive hospice care in palm beach county, florida through its fundraising efforts.

Human Services

Habitat for Humanity of Collier

Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is part of a global, nonprofit housing Organization operated on Christian principles that seeks to put God's love into action by building homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter

Florida K of C Charities Inc

The florida k of c charities inc. identifies and cultivates potential donors and solicits and administers gifts to agencies which support the handicapped citizens, battered and abused women, and unwed mothers of the state of florida.…

Philanthropy

St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital, st. joseph's hospital -…

Health

Hospice of Health First Inc

Our team improving the wellness and health of you and your family through excellent and compassionate health care.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is St Matthews House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/22

the rest of the field

2,373/25,067

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

18/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,925,351Human Services$414,000Health$136,000International$92,000Philanthropy$70,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Education$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · The United Way of Lee County Inc · Carol B Phelon Foundation · United Way of Collier and the Keys · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Bosom Buddies Breast Cancer Support Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 650539336 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Bosom Buddies Breast Cancer Support Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation?

More from the funding graph

John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John B & Nancy K Dee Foundation?

More from the funding graph