Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Helen Timo Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$185kReligion$114kArts & Culture$93kInternational$93kEducation$31kCommunity Improvement$18kEmployment$17kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARPATHO RUSYN RESEARCH CENTER$58,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$22,000
25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT$15,000
KENWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$15,000
CARPATHO RUSYN SOCIETY$15,000
CARPATHO RUSYN RESEARCH CENTER$6,000
POSTNATURAL$5,000
CARPATHO RUSYN SOCIETY$2,000
NEW SUN RISING$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$1,500
25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT$1,500
SISTERS OF THE ORDER OF SAINT BASIL THE GREAT$1,500
TACONIC MUSIC INC$1,000
BULGARIAN-MACEDONIAN NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL AND CULT$1,000
SAINT JOHN CHRYSOSTOM BYZANTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $2k → 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $1k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $2k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $2k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $2k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $2k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $1k → 11%WOMENS CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PGH: $500 → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $1k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
UT
VA
MD
NM
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$353k · 23 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
23

Total granted

$353k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+7%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CARPATHO RUSYN SOCIETY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $42k · revenue +65%
  • NS
    NEW SUN RISING
    5× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue +70%
  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ASSOCIATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue -8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • GS
    GLOBAL SLOVAKIA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
GlobalPittsburgh

GlobalPittsburgh is a nonprofit organization with a mission to forge cultural, educational, and business relationships between Western Pennsylvania and the global community through citizen diplomacy.

Community Improvement
2
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
3
Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh

The mission of carnegie library of pittsburgh is to foster literacy, enable exploration, and create connections with all our neighbors. see full description in schedule o.

Education
4
Carnegie Institute

To preserve and expand the resources of art and science as agents of personal growth and social advancement in pittsburgh and beyond.

Arts & Culture
5
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
6
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
7
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education
8
Public Trust

Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.

Arts & Culture
9
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
10
Collegium Institute

Collegium Institute is a Catholic intellectual apostolate that fosters the Catholic intellectual tradition within the University of Pennsylvania community and within the greater region and secular academia. (Continued on Sch. O)

—
11
Carnegie Mellon University

To create a transformative educational experience for students focused on deep disciplinary knowledge; problem solving; leadership, communication and interpersonal skills; and personal health and well-being. to cultivate a transformative…

—
12
Pittsburgh Entertainment Project

To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Old Croton Aqueduct. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARPATHO RUSYN RESEARCH CENTER: $141,600 · OtherCARPATHO RUSYN RESEARCH CENTERMT ST MACRINA HOUSE OF PRAYER: $72,000 · OtherMT ST MACRINA HOUSE OF PRAYERCARPATHO RUSYN RESEARCH CENTER: $64,000 · OtherCARPATHO RUSYN RESEARCH CENTERSISTERS OF THE ORDER OF SAINT BASIL THE GREAT: $22,700 · OtherSISTERS OF THE ORDER OF SAINT BASIL THE GREAT25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT: $16,500 · OtherKENWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · Other+27 more: $74,854 · Other+27 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $86,300 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOU…+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyCARPATHO RUSYN SOCIETY: $42,450 · Arts & CultureCARPATHO R…FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED …CZECHOSLOVAK GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCZECHOSLOV…BULGARIAN-MACEDONIAN NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL AND CUL: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBULGARIAN-…+3 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureNEW SUN RISING: $8,800 · Human ServicesCASA SAN JOSE: $3,000 · Human ServicesWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $1,000 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $500 · Human ServicesTHE CREATING LANDSCAPES LEARNING CENTER INC: $2,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,500 · EducationMonroeville Public Library Fund: $1,500 · EducationBENTLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $750 · EducationAVONWORTH COMMUNITIES TOGETHER: $500 · EducationTAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER: $4,000 · AnimalsTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$406,654Philanthropy$86,550Arts & Culture$54,450Human Services$13,800Education$6,250Animals$4,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $86,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARPATHO RUSYN SOCIETY: $42,450 over 5y, 15% of budget25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT: $16,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW SUN RISING: $8,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER: $4,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCZECHOSLOVAK GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCASA SAN JOSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBULGARIAN-MACEDONIAN NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL AND CUL: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CREATING LANDSCAPES LEARNING CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMonroeville Public Library Fund: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTACONIC MUSIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH PREP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE OLD CROTON AQUEDUCT: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL OPERA HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CARPATHO RUSYN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds 25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW SUN RISING ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CZECHOSLOVAK GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds BULGARIAN-MACEDONIAN NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL AND CUL ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CREATING LANDSCAPES LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Monroeville Public Library Fund ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TACONIC MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH PREP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Opportunity Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · McKinney Charitable Foundation · Program to Aid Citizen Enterprise Inc · McElhattan Foundation · Poise Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Johnstown · The Heinz Endowments

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Helen Timo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Helen Timo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Helen Timo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Helen Timo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Helen Timo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph