Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$102kYouth Development$87kHuman Services$65kReligion$35kHealth$27kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$10kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$313k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILL FOUNDATION$22,000
CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$5,000
ASHUELOT CONCERTS$3,000
FREEDOM REINS RIDING CENTER$2,000
KURN HATTIN HOMES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%HUNDRED NIGHTS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaitonlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$304k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+3%

Still filing today

42%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHILL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $87k · revenue +28%
  • MF
    MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +67%
  • AC
    ASHUELOT CONCERTS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH WALPOLE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • UV
    Upper Valley Hostel Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • CA
    CONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monadnock Media Inc

To produce educational media productions for museums

Arts & Culture
2
North Country Center for the Arts Inc

A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire

Arts & Culture
3
Monadnock Habitat for Humanity

To provide low-cost housing, home repairs, and other support to economically disadvantaged families.

—
4
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
5
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

—
6
Monadnock Affordable Housing Corporation

Provide affordable housing to low-income persons and management and maintenance services for low-income housing projects.

Housing & Shelter
7
Monadnock Economic Development Corp

Promotion of business development and relocations to the monadnock region of new hampshire.

Community Improvement
8
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
9
Monadnock Music

Monadnock music makes exceptional music accessible to all in intimate and informal settings in the town and villages of the monadnock region and beyond. through a commitment to varied and imaginative performances and teaching, monadnock…

—
10
Monadnock Community Early Learning Center

Early learning services

Human Services
11
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
12
Northampton Community Music Center Inc

The schools mission is to foster the love and pursuit of music within the community through quality activities that are accessible to all.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monadnock Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Monadnock Arts-in-Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER: $74,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTERASHUELOT CONCERTS: $13,000 · Arts & CultureASHUELOT CONCERTSCONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH WALPOLE: $20,000 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH WA…HOME HEALTHCARE HOSPICE AND COMMUNI: $16,500 · OtherHOME HEALTHCARE HOSPICE AND CO…WEST SWANZEY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherWEST SWANZEY COMMUNITY CHURCHNH CHARITABLE FDN - MONAD REG: $10,000 · OtherNH CHARITABLE FDN - MONAD REGCOLONIAL THEATER EDUCATIONAL SCHOLA: $9,200 · OtherCOLONIAL THEATER EDUCATIONAL S…FALL MOUNTAIN SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $7,500 · OtherFALL MOUNTAIN SPECIAL OLYMPICSHome HealthCare Hospice & Community Services Inc: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherFREEDOM REINS RIDING CENTER: $4,000 · Other+3 more: $4,500 · OtherCHILL FOUNDATION: $87,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILL FOUNDATIONCrotched Mountain Foundation: $45,000 · Human ServicesCrotched Mountain Fou…MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 · Human ServicesMONADNOCK FAMILY SERV…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesUpper Valley Hostel Inc: $5,000 · HealthMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · Animals
Arts & Culture$97,000Other$96,700Youth Development$87,000Human Services$66,000Health$5,000Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILL FOUNDATION: $87,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER: $74,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetCrotched Mountain Foundation: $45,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASHUELOT CONCERTS: $13,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetUpper Valley Hostel Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHome HealthCare Hospice & Community Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNDRED NIGHTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONADNOCK ARTS-IN-EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Crotched Mountain Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ASHUELOT CONCERTS ↗
  • Who funds Upper Valley Hostel Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds Home HealthCare Hospice & Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNDRED NIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONADNOCK ARTS-IN-EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Hoffman Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • National Marine Life Center Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Chill Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton’s filings →

More from the funding graph