· Private foundation
John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILL FOUNDATION | $22,000 |
| CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ASHUELOT CONCERTS | $3,000 |
| FREEDOM REINS RIDING CENTER | $2,000 |
| KURN HATTIN HOMES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHILL FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $87k · revenue +28%
- MFMONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +67%
- ACASHUELOT CONCERTS3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- FCFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH WALPOLEone grant, 2023 · $20k
- UVUpper Valley Hostel Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +42%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To produce educational media productions for museums
A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire
To provide low-cost housing, home repairs, and other support to economically disadvantaged families.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
Provide affordable housing to low-income persons and management and maintenance services for low-income housing projects.
Promotion of business development and relocations to the monadnock region of new hampshire.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
Monadnock music makes exceptional music accessible to all in intimate and informal settings in the town and villages of the monadnock region and beyond. through a commitment to varied and imaginative performances and teaching, monadnock…
Early learning services
We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.
The schools mission is to foster the love and pursuit of music within the community through quality activities that are accessible to all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monadnock Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Monadnock Arts-in-Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Crotched Mountain Foundation ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ASHUELOT CONCERTS ↗
- Who funds Upper Valley Hostel Inc ↗
- Who funds Home HealthCare Hospice & Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds CONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HUNDRED NIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK ARTS-IN-EDUCATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Hoffman Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John & Carol Hubbard Charitable Foundaiton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Marine Life Center Inc — 16% of income from government
- Chill Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.