Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joe and Van Mabee Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$225kArts & Culture$198kYouth Development$142kHealth$138kHuman Services$131kAnimals$97kHousing & Shelter$45kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC$30,000
CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$25,000
SANTA FE OPERA$25,000
LIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION$20,000
APHASIA CENTER OF MIDLAND$15,000
FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $15k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $15k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $15k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $15k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $10k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $10k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $10k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $7k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$1.0M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+3%

Still filing today

64%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +79%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $188k · revenue +49%
  • LB
    LIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $142k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA NATIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • JH
    JOHN HAGEE MINISTIRES SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midlands Humane Society

To protect and nurture companion animals and enrich the lives of people who love them.

Animals
2
Midland Festival Ballet

Midland festival ballet is a 501(c)3 nonprofit whose mission is to promote and present the art of classical ballet through education, performance, and outreach.

Arts & Culture
3
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Midland County

Our mission is to provide an adoption-friendly animal shelter that will unify the community toward a common goal of responsible animal treatment and increased animal adoptions to design and incorporate new education and public programs…

—
5
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
6
Mission Health Care Inc

The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.

Health
7
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
8
Helping Our Riders Succeed in Education

The H.O.R.S.E. Center is an established, multi-faceted equine facility committed to deepening the strength of emotional, physical, and conceptual connections utilizing diverse modalities to to elevate our clients to better themselves.

Human Services
9
Midland Community Theatre Inc

Midland community theatre provides opportunities for all people af all ages to participate in and experience qualtiy theatre arts and education.

Arts & Culture
10
Midland School Corporation

Midland school provides a distinctive co-educational boarding school experience to a diverse student body in grades 9-12. through study and work, midland teaches the value of a lifetime of learning, self-reliance, simplicity,…

Education
11
Arts Council of Midland

Enriching lives with the arts through community wide advocacy, education, outreach, and promotion.

Arts & Culture
12
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Teen Court Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bush Tennis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

APHASIA CENTER OF MIDLAND: $126,250 · OtherAPHASIA CENTER OF MIDLANDSENIOR LINK MIDLAND TEXAS: $38,000 · OtherSENIOR LINK MIDLAND TEXASYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SEVICES: $35,000 · OtherYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SEVICE…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $25,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA NATIVE: $15,000 · OtherJOHN HAGEE MINISTIRES SANCTUARY: $12,000 · OtherBUSH TENNIS CENTER: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $12,500 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $225,000 · EducationCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN …THE SANTA FE OPERA: $187,500 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERAMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO F…LIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION INC: $142,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIGHTNING BOY …MIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC: $115,000 · AnimalsMIDLAND HUM…FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $102,730 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SE…CHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterMIDLAND TEEN COURT INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$298,750Education$225,000Arts & Culture$222,500Youth Development$142,000Animals$115,000Human Services$102,730Housing & Shelter$10,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $225,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $187,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION INC: $142,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetMIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC: $115,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $102,730 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBUSH TENNIS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMIDLAND TEEN COURT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTNING BOY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND TEEN COURT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · John and Maurine Cox Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Warren Charitable Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joe and Van Mabee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joe and Van Mabee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joe and Van Mabee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph