· Private foundation
Joco Angels Opioid Awareness and Support
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Recovery Alive Inc | $12,590 |
| Hope Center Ministries | $8,250 |
| Oxford House | $1,220 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $461 |
| Bethel Colony of Mercy | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| Johnston County Health Dept | $100 |
| Haven of Love and Restoration Inc | $50 |
| Allianz | $37 |
| Living Waters | $21 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +141% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHope Center Ministries Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $68k · revenue 0%
- RARECOVERY ALIVE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +141%
- FBFreedom Biker Church2× · 2021–2022 · $10k
Funded once
- GIGrow in Grace Sober Living Homeone grant, 2022 · $11k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $3k
- WRWILKES RECOVERY REVOLUTION INCone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Shalom House Ministries Inc operates a treatment center for women struggling with drug and alcohol addition. It also offers transitional dwelling for women who need a safe place after treatment.
To provide guidance and rehabilitation in a christ centered residential setting for persons with addiction
A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.
Reclaim individuals from a life of addiction, Rebuild them in spiritual sobriety in Christ, and Restore them to productive, Christ-like service in society.
Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.
Health Recovery Services, Inc is an abstinence based behavioral healthcare resource providing consumer centered services to improve the quality of life for individuals, families, and communities. (served 1967 clients)
Christian ministry connecting resources and programs to the needs of the community with a focus on recovery from addiction. All services are provided to amplify Jesus and bring glory to God.
Program for Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery
Resurrection power provides faith-based addiction recovery houses. pastoral care is provided to help build residents' spiritual recovery.
To provide Christ-based recovery from addiction through an in-house program and then establish them back into the community.
To empower individuals to renew their lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wilkes Recovery Revolution Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tri-County Community Health Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hope Center Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Oxford House Inc ↗
- Who funds WILKES RECOVERY REVOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds BETHEL COLONY OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING WATERS PUBLICATIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joco Angels Opioid Awareness and Support funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Joco Angels Opioid Awareness and Support?
Find your warmest path to Joco Angels Opioid Awareness and Support through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.