· Public charity
Jobs with Justice Education Fund
JWJEF is a national organization network Organization with 39 coalitions in 26 states across the country.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $2,146,062 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,706,119 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $560,057 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $408k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $684k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jobs With Justice San Francisco | $430,000 |
| Working Families Organization | $253,750 |
| Middle Tennessee Jobs with Justice | $193,600 |
| Central Florida Jobs With Justice | $190,750 |
| DC Jobs With Justice | $168,100 |
| Black Male Initiative Georgia Inc | $120,000 |
| The Maurice & Jane Sugar Law Center | $100,000 |
| Colorado Jobs With Justice | $80,000 |
| Clark Atlanta University | $70,000 |
| ALIGN The Alliance for a Greater | $60,000 |
| Cleveland Jobs With Justice | $60,000 |
| University of Texas at Arlington | $40,000 |
| University of Arizona | $40,000 |
| Jackson State University | $40,000 |
| Clinton College | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $487k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JWJobs with Justice San Francisco6× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +241% · 38% of their budget
- NBNorth Bay Jobs With Justice7× · 2017–2024 · $759k · revenue +943% · 40% of their budget
- CJCOLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $534k · revenue +237% · 40% of their budget
Funded once
STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $617k · revenue +154%- CPCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +26%
- UFUnited for Respectone grant, 2021 · $478k · revenue -73% · 27% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jobs with Justice is the nations only policy and advocacy organization dedicated to advancing workers rights to form unions and bargain with their employers for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions.
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
To advance the rights of workers by engaging diverse faith communities into action, from grassroots organizing to shaping policy at the local, state and national levels. They envision a nation where all workers enjoy the rights to:…
Towards justice is a nonprofit law firm that seeks to advance economic equity and worker power through impact litigation, strategic policy advocacy, and collaboration with organizers and public agencies. we were founded in response to the…
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
LaborLab is a nonprofit watchdog dedicated to safeguarding workers rights to organize, win strong contracts, and build lasting collective power. Through strategic research, educational resources, and corporate accountability, we empower…
Worker Justice Center of New York, Inc. (WJCNY) pusues juistice for those denied hian rights, with a focus on agricultural and other low-wage workers, through legal representation, community empowerment and advocacy for institutional…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Labor Education and Research Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Good Works Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jobs with Justice San Francisco ↗
- Who funds North Bay Jobs With Justice ↗
- Who funds United for Respect Education Fund ↗
- Who funds STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL FLORIDA JOBS WITH JUSTICE CORP ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER ↗
- Who funds United for Respect ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA AREA JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY ↗
- Who funds GOOD JOBS FIRST ↗
- Who funds JOBS TO MOVE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Warehouse Worker Resource Center ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds JOBS WITH JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND Middle Tennessee Jobs With Justice ↗
- Who funds JOBS WITH JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS EN LUCHA ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BORDER RIGHTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONG ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ALIGN THE ALLIANCE FOR A GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds TOMPKINS COUNTY WORKERS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK MALE INITIATIVE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds THE MAURICE & JANE SUGAR LAW CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Jobs with Justice · Working Families Organization Inc · United for Respect Education Fund · The Ford Foundation · Windward Fund · Solidago Foundation · New Venture Fund · Center for Popular Democracy Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jobs with Justice Education Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners for Women and Justice Inc — 26% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.