Skip to content
Jj Haines Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jj Haines Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$73kInternational$20kHealth$16kEmployment$15kRecreation & Sports$9kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$8kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$4,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALING ART MISSIONS$18,000
ACT FOR ALEXANDRIA$8,025
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$4,500
ACTS LEGACY FOUNDATION$4,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$4,500
UNITED WAY SUNCOAST$4,500
CURE PSP$4,500
SEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER$4,500
CLIFTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,500
SPAN INC$4,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The America Red Cross: $2k → 14%SPAN INC: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22k · 4 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
26

Total granted

$22k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+23%

Still filing today

25%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
PhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $42k · revenue -34%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY CENTRAL MD
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FC
    FLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
9
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherFLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY CENTRAL MD: $5,155 · OtherUNITED WAY CENTRAL MDFLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherFLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INCUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MD: $4,899 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MDCLIFTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4,500 · OtherCLIFTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,500 · OtherSEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTERBIG BROTHER BIG SISTER: $4,000 · OtherBIG BROTHER BIG SISTERIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $4,500 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC+18 more: $13,400 · Other+18 moreTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $42,212 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND…ACTS LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyACTS LEGACY FOUNDATION INCUNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY SUNCOAST INCHEALING ART MISSIONS: $18,000 · InternationalHEALING ART M…Save The Children Federation Inc: $1,905 · InternationalSave The Chil…CUREPSP INC: $4,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,500 · HealthACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $8,025 · Community ImprovementSPAN Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,500 · EducationGood Samaritan Foundation of Texas Inc: $1,000 · Education
Other$68,954Philanthropy$51,212International$19,905Health$9,000Community Improvement$8,025Human Services$6,000Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $42,212 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING ART MISSIONS: $18,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $8,025 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACTS LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPAN Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,905 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Samaritan Foundation of Texas Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF HARFORD COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WYTHE COUNTY INC: $161 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER RICHMOND & PETERSBURG: $144 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jj Haines Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jj Haines Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
  • United Way Suncoast Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jj Haines Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jj Haines Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jj Haines’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home