Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Education Center of Cleveland

The mission is to inspire transformative Jewish educational experiences that add meaning to the lives of Jewish children and their families in Cleveland.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$223k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$6.1MReligion$2.5MHuman Services$422kYouth Development$101kEmployment$90kPhilanthropy$6k
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 34 grants below total $2,034,659, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,531,143 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,496,484 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $293k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.7M
$24,909
Median grant
4
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mandel Jewish Day School$222,928
Gross Schechter Day School$206,661
Hebrew Academy$190,000
Fuchs Mizrachi Day School$170,840
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah$155,000
Case Western Reserve University$143,793
JCC Association$125,000
Mandel Jewish Community Ctr$116,116
Congregation Mishkan Or$102,698
Partners in Torah$100,000
Park Synagogue$67,408
Jewish Family Experience$52,500
Bnai Jeshurun Congregation$52,293
Sububan Temple$39,066
Aish Hatorah$32,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCC Association: $125k → 17%Mandel Jewish Community Ctr: $117k → 17%Mandel Jewish Community Ctr: $116k → 17%Mandel Jewish Community Ctr: $96k → 17%Mandel Jewish Community Ctr: $93k → 17%Partners in Torah: $100k → 17%Partners in Torah: $100k → 17%Partners in Torah: $100k → 17%Partners in Torah: $100k → 17%Partners in Torah: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 27 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
6

Total granted

$8.1M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+40%

Still filing today

41%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +48%
  • GS
    GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $987k · revenue +34%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $875k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $125k · revenue +40%
  • CF
    CHABAD FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2025 · $6k
  • TC
    TWINSBURG CHABAD
    one grant, 2025 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Columbus Jewish Day School

The columbus jewish day school operates an elementary school with students in kindergarten through fifth grade. the school integrates judaic studies into its curriculum, which includes, in addition to core classes, music, art, computer and…

Education
2
Jewish Parent Cooperative School Inc

Jcs is a parent participation elementary school, collaboratively governed by parents and teachers designed to foster a lifelong love of learning and meaningful connection to hashem.

Education
3
Rabbi David L Silver Yeshiva Academy

To provide education in general and judiac studies

Education
4
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Jewish Community Day School Inc

Provide a premier Jewish education that: nurtures each student's capacity for intellectual discovery and decision-making within a respectful, pluralist, bilingual Hebrew-English environment; gives our graduates the ability to create their…

Education
7
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
8
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
9
Mesivta of Cleveland Dba Yeshivas Toras

Operation of an all male Religious Orthodox Jewish High School

Education
10
Commission for Jewish Education of Greater Youngstown

The mission of the commission for jewish education is to build a strong foundation of quality jewish education for all jews in our regional community; to educate the community in the history, language, tradition and literature of the…

Religion
11
Denver Academy of Torah

Denver academy of torah (the "school")provides education to students from kindergarten through high school. the school's mission is to nuture students to be torah-observant role models and future leaders through an intellectually rigorous…

Education
12
Gesher School Inc

At Gesher Jewish Day School we inspire our students to be passionate about learning, practice justice, kindness and respect, aspire to a life guided by Jewish values, torah and community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew Academy of Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Case Western Reserve University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $906,996 · OtherHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELANDFUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS: $838,973 · OtherFUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLSPARK SYNAGOGUE: $287,069 · OtherPARK SYNAGOGUEB'NAI JESHURUN CONGREGATION: $283,628 · OtherB'NAI JESHURUN CONGREGATIONJEWISH FAMILY EXPERIENCE: $251,700 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY EXPERIENCECONGREGATION MISHKAN OR: $227,511 · OtherCONGREGATION MISHKAN ORSuburban Temple - Kol Ami: $215,582 · OtherAISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND: $200,000 · Other+16 more: $1,007,912 · Other+16 moreJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $1,096,811 · EducationJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $874,685 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYYESHIVA DERECH HATORAH: $606,773 · EducationYESHIVA DERECH HATORAHSEGULA: $214,374 · EducationSEGULA+1 more: $54,351 · EducationPartners In Torah of Cleveland Inc: $500,000 · Human ServicesPartners In …The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $421,953 · Human ServicesThe Mandel J…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $125,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMU…GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $987,321 · ReligionGROSS SCHECH…B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $100,924 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $5,985 · Philanthropy
Other$4,219,371Education$2,846,994Human Services$1,046,953Religion$987,321Youth Development$100,924Philanthropy$5,985

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $1,096,811 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $987,321 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $906,996 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $874,685 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS: $838,973 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH HATORAH: $606,773 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPartners In Torah of Cleveland Inc: $500,000 over 5y, 36% of budgetThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $421,953 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSEGULA: $214,374 over 5y, 24% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $100,924 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Learning Connection: $96,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCHAVIVA HIGH SCHOOL: $54,351 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $5,985 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DERECH HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds Partners In Torah of Cleveland Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland ↗
  • Who funds SEGULA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Learning Connection ↗
  • Who funds CHAVIVA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of ClevelandOH54.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Madav IX Foundation · The Joseph and Florence Mandel Family- Penni M and Stephen J Weinberg Family Fund · Irving I Stone Foundation · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · J David & Rebecca Heller Family Foundation · Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral Association · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Education Center of Cleveland funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Education Center of Cleveland. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Education Center of Cleveland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph