Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Community Board of Akron

The jcba is a volunteer association of concerned and committed people that exists for the purpose of preserving, enhancing, and perpetuating the jewish way of life.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$2.3MEducation$2.0MReligion$933kPhilanthropy$914kHealth$355kArts & Culture$189kInternational$64kFood & Nutrition$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $360,202 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,736,457 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,376,255 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $162k
$19,852
Median grant
5
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMM CENTER OF AKRON$97,005
AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$65,119
TEMPLE ISREAL$48,661
THE LIPPMAN SCHOOL$35,515
HOPE HAVEN CHILDREN'S HOME$20,000
BETH EL CONGREGATION$19,852
JEWIS FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND$19,833
REVER ROADANSHE SFARD SYNAGO$15,717
AKRON GENERAL FOUNDATION$15,000
COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS$12,500
HADASSAH THE WOMANS ZIONIST$11,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SUMMIT COUNTY OHIO: $5k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $453k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $418k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $375k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $361k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $214k → 13%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF AKRON: $97k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $61k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $59k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $33k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 20 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$6.1M
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+36%

Still filing today

60%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIPPMAN SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +40%
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $275k · revenue +65%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $238k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SC
    STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY
    one grant, 2020 · $55k · revenue +4%
  • AR
    AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +1%
  • HI
    HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue +68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
8
Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation

The Mt. Sinai Health Foundation improves the health of Greater Cleveland by investing resources, convening, and collaborating - with a focus on: - Equitable health outcomes- Health of the Jewish community- Academic medicine and bioscience…

Health
9
Fuchs Mizrachi Schools

The mission of fuchs mizrachi school is to educate each child in the orthodox jewish religious zionist tradition, imbued with the love of g-d, torah, people and the land of israel.

—
10
Clal-the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc

A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.

Religion
11
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oh Ky & in and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Assoc of Conservation District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr12%3%5–10yr21%3%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr16%30%35–55yr20%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%1%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr16%17%35–55yr20%80%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,260

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON — $1,951,380 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRONJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF AKRON OHIO — $120,428 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF AKRON OHI…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIPPMAN SCHOOL — $1,783,413 · EducationTHE LIPPMAN SCHOOLNORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $223,648 · EducationNORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY …+1 more — $50,000 · EducationTEMPLE ISRAEL — $372,889 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELCHABAD JEWISH RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION — $225,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH REL…BETH EL CONGREGATION — $127,575 · OtherBETH EL CONGREGAT…REVERE RD SYNAGOGUE — $44,217 · OtherAMERICAN PHYSICIANS FELLOWSHIP INC FOR MEDICINE IN ISRAEL — $36,000 · OtherAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK — $40,000 · Other+17 more — $228,000 · Other+17 moreAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $436,623 · PhilanthropyAKRON COMMUNIT…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $237,518 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED …UNITED WAY OF SUMMIT AND MEDINA — $210,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …+2 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $275,000 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $55,000 · Health+5 more — $35,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO — $153,818 · ReligionCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY — $50,000 · Religion+1 more — $5,000 · ReligionAKRON ART MUSEUM — $150,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Association — $5,700 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$2,076,808Education$2,057,061Other$1,073,681Philanthropy$904,141Health$365,000Religion$208,818Arts & Culture$155,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON — $1,951,380 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetTHE LIPPMAN SCHOOL — $1,783,413 over 7y, 21% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $436,623 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $275,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $237,518 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $223,648 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SUMMIT AND MEDINA — $210,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO — $153,818 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAKRON ART MUSEUM — $150,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF AKRON OHIO — $120,428 over 2y, 16% of budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $55,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY — $50,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PHYSICIANS FELLOWSHIP INC FOR MEDICINE IN ISRAEL — $36,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENORAH PARK FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association — $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR COMMUNITY HILLEL HOUSE DBA HILLEL AT KENT STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRMH OF AKRONINC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community Found…The Marks Family Foun…United Way of Summit …Sisler McFawn Foundat…Kenneth L Calhoun Cha…Lehner Family Foundat…L R Moffitt & L W Mof…The Welty Family Foun…Burton D Morgan Found…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…
Akron Community FoundationOH27.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · The Marks Family Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Kenneth L Calhoun Char Tr · Lehner Family Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Community Board of Akron funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home