Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Marks Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$56kHealth$56kPhilanthropy$48kArts & Culture$29kCommunity Improvement$25kReligion$16kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$527
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AKRON MARATHON CORPORATION$2,000
COMUNALE FOUNDATION$1,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
SIERRA CLUB$250
TEMPLE ISRAEL$250
SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BATTERED WOMENS SHELTER: $1k → 13%AKRON BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$187k · 23 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
69

Total granted

$187k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

26%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +82%
  • AS
    AKRON SOUL TRAIN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • A
    ARTSNOW
    2× · 2018–2022 · $700 · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • LF
    LIEBERTH FUND AT ACF
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • PP
    PORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • LF
    LISBETH FUND AT AFC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
3
Akron Development Corporation

The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through the former akron global business accelerator and to secure state of ohio funding for technology-based…

Community Improvement
4
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
5
The Akron Marathon Charitable Corporation

At the akron marathon charitable corporation, our mission is to inspire healthier lives and a stronger community through our three-part race series and events. we are committed to creating dynamic, welcoming race experiences that promote…

Philanthropy
6
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area

9
Akron Bar Association

To enhance the quality of law and justice through community service and to maintain the integrity of the profession.

10
Akron Community Service Center & Urban League Inc

To improve the quality of life for the citizens of summit county, particularly african americans, by advocating and facilitating programs that are economically and educationally transformational, impacting their lives and the lives of…

Human Services
11
Akron Roundtable

Akron roundtable brings speakers to akron who inform, educate and stimulate listeners on topics of importance to the region, the country and the world.

12
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Akron Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts Organizatio…Regional Economic Developme…Behavioral Health & Recover…Community Grantmaking Found…Community Support ServicesOhio Policy Advocacy Organi…Professional & Trade Associ…Disability Services & Suppo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%7%<5yr13%16%5–10yr17%10%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr22%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr13%4%5–10yr17%7%10–20yr14%41%20–35yr15%8%35–55yr22%37%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
13%
1,600/12,725

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
14/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON — $37,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AKRONCURATED STOREFRONT — $22,000 · OtherCURATED STOREFRONTAKRON MARATHON CORPORATION — $17,250 · OtherAKRON MARATHON CORPORATIONAKRON CIVIC THEATRE — $16,300 · OtherAKRON CIVIC THEATRETEMPLE ISRAEL — $15,300 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELJEWISH CENTER BOARD OF AKRON — $9,100 · Other+66 more — $64,728 · Other+66 moreSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $31,525 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING P…PORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $5,000 · HealthPORTAGE PATH BEHAV…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $2,000 · HealthJ&F Memorial Fund Inc — $1,750 · Health+2 more — $1,025 · HealthAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $9,925 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON — $2,600 · Philanthropy+1 more — $250 · PhilanthropyAKRON SOUL TRAIN — $5,000 · Arts & CultureAkron History Center — $2,500 · Arts & CultureAKRON ART MUSEUM — $1,500 · Arts & CultureSUMMIT ARTSPACE — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC — $800 · Arts & CultureARTSNOW — $700 · Arts & CultureLaw and Leadership Institute LLC — $500 · EducationOHIO NEWS MEDIA FOUNDATION — $500 · EducationLEADERSHIP AKRON — $250 · EducationPELOTONIA — $200 · EducationHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER — $1,200 · Human ServicesRUNNING2BWELL — $500 · Recreation & SportsWEST AKRON BASEBALL LEAGUE — $400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$182,178Health$41,300Philanthropy$12,775Arts & Culture$11,500Education$1,450Human Services$1,200Recreation & Sports$900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $31,525 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $9,925 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON SOUL TRAIN — $5,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON — $2,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJ&F Memorial Fund Inc — $1,750 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAKRON ART MUSEUM — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARSON STRONG FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMIT ARTSPACE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTSNOW — $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT METRO PARKS FOUNDATION — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw and Leadership Institute LLC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUNNING2BWELL — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOHIO NEWS MEDIA FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRMH OF AKRONINC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP AKRON — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUECOATS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY
  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AKRON SOUL TRAIN
  • Who funds PORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON
  • Who funds Akron History Center
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds J&F Memorial Fund Inc
  • Who funds AKRON ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds THE CARSON STRONG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SUMMIT ARTSPACE
  • Who funds STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC
  • Who funds ARTSNOW

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehner Family FoundationOH36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehner Family Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Gar Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Synthomer Foundation Inc · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · The Welty Family Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Marks Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marks Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marks Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph