Skip to content
Jewel in Giving Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jewel in Giving Foundation Inc

$1k
Granted FY2020
31
Grants FY2020
15
States reached
$390
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$19
Median grant
15
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOS Childrens Villages Florida$390
Heart to Heart International$181
Planned Parenthood$135
American Humane Society$84
JARC Florida$68
Donna Klein Jewish Academy$52
Breast Cancer Research Foundation$48
The Actors Fund Of America$39
Childrens Literacy Initiative$39
Coalition of Labor Union Women CLUW$37
Cure Alzheimers Fund$36
The Wild Animal Sanctuary$31
World Wildlife Fund$31
Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems I$28
Florida Breast Cancer Foundation$21
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Southeastern Guide Dogs: $3 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Jewel in Giving Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 41% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Jewel in Giving Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
8
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
9
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
10
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $390 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCPlanned Parenthood: $135 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN: $37 · OtherCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMENTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $39 · OtherTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICAWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $31 · Other+8 more: $59 · Other+8 moreHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $181 · InternationalHEART TO HEART …+1 more: $3 · InternationalAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $84 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUM…THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $31 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANI…Humane World for Animals International: $17 · AnimalsHumane World…Wildlife Conservation Society: $12 · AnimalsWildlife Con…THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $7 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $36 · HealthBALTIMORE SUBSTANCE ABUSE SYSTEMS INC: $28 · HealthFLORIDA BREAST CANCER COALITION RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $21 · Health+4 more: $12 · HealthDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $52 · EducationCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $39 · EducationJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $68 · Housing & ShelterTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $48 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$691International$184Animals$151Health$97Education$91Housing & Shelter$68Public Safety & Disaster$48

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $390 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $181 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $84 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $68 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $39 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $39 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN: $37 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $31 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $31 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA BREAST CANCER COALITION RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $21 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $19 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $17 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $12 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $7 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $3 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC9.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewel in Giving Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewel in Giving Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jewel in Giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home