· Private foundation
Jerry & Marcia Tubergen Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $390k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $661k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CURE INTERNATIONAL INC | $1,500,000 |
| NORTHPOINTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS | $750,000 |
| CURE INTERNATIONAL INC | $500,000 |
| NORTHPOINTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS | $500,000 |
| ADA TOWNSHIP | $200,000 |
| GRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LEIPERS FORK | $160,240 |
| THE JERRY AND MARCY TUBERGEN FUND (AT NCF) | $101,000 |
| COLSON CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW | $75,000 |
| CAPSTONE LEGACY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| NORTHPOINTE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THAT DAY | $40,000 |
| RELATIONAL CONCEPTS INC | $30,000 |
| GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC | $25,000 |
| LEE STROBEL MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $431k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTHPOINTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS4× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +174%
- MTMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES5× · 2020–2024 · $928k · revenue +41%
- GCGRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LEIPERS4× · 2021–2024 · $335k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CUCORNERSTONE UNIVERSITY (WCSG RADIO)one grant, 2021 · $250k
- CUCornerstone Universityone grant, 2020 · $205k · revenue -15%
- MOMUSEUM OF THE BIBLEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Curating for Him Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHPOINTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
- Who funds GRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LEIPERS ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone University ↗
- Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THAT DAY ↗
- Who funds DEGAGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Alpha USA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds Relational Concepts Inc ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Colson Center for Christian Worldview ↗
- Who funds The Potters House ↗
- Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds EVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
- Who funds MORIAH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Capstone Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIAN TRAILS CAMP ↗
- Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds THE CAUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAITH SEXUALITY AND GENDER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds GLEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds God's World Publications Inc ↗
- Who funds LEE STROBEL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · Daniel & Pamella Devos Foundation · Steve & Amy Van Andel Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Frey Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jerry & Marcia Tubergen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jerry & Marcia Tubergen Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jerry & Marcia Tubergen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.