Skip to content
Jerome Daley Apostolic Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jerome Daley Apostolic Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$92kHuman Services$39kFood & Nutrition$9kInternational$4kEducation$4kYouth Development$2kHealth$2kEmployment$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$1,300
Median grant
5
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE CHURCH$15,030
RYAN PETERSON JOHN DOE MINISTRIES$10,000
CLINT MILLER JOHN DOE MINISTRIES$2,000
BEN GOODMAN JOHN DOE MINISTRIES$1,300
THE HUNGER COALITION$1,030
MPACT CHURCHES$720
RICK CLARKE JOHN DOE MINISTRIES$291
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOWLING ROCK CARES: $662 → 21%BOWLING ROCK CARES: $500 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MI
MA
IN
CA
MO
DE
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 18 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$102k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+46%

Still filing today

28%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthInternationalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +14%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +106%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF CHRIST THE SAVIOR
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TH
    THE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +177%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unify Ministries
Religion
2
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
3
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
4
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
5
One Life Ministries
Religion
6
Salt With a Mission

Teach the ministry of christ

Religion
7
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
8
The Blessing Movement
Human Services
9
Light and Salvation Ministries
Religion
10
Transform Ministries
—
11
Spiritual Light Ministries
Religion
12
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Refugees International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE CHURCH: $25,265 · OtherGRACE CHURCHHARVEST HOUSE: $23,992 · OtherHARVEST HOUSECHURCH OF CHRIST THE SAVIOR: $14,000 · OtherCHURCH OF CHRIST THE SAVIORRYAN PETERSON JOHN DOE MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherRYAN PETERSON JOHN DOE MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRAC5ORG: $8,450 · OtherTRAC5ORGANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $6,400 · OtherCROSSNORE: $6,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherGRACE CHURCH SOUTHERN PINES: $5,000 · Other+25 more: $27,203 · Other+25 moreSEEDS OF LIFE: $6,600 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,410 · ReligionThe Vining Center Inc: $980 · ReligionLEGACY MINISTRIES: $600 · Religion+1 more: $15 · ReligionTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $5,535 · Food & NutritionBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $2,680 · Food & NutritionMANNA UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · EducationYOUNG LIFE: $2,350 · Youth DevelopmentSTARLIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $1,030 · HealthONE MISSION INC: $515 · HealthRESTORATION HOUSE WNC: $295 · Health+1 more: $34 · HealthREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,282 · InternationalOPEN USA: $500 · International
Other$141,560Religion$10,605Food & Nutrition$8,215Education$3,500Youth Development$2,350Health$1,874International$1,782

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEEDS OF LIFE: $6,600 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $5,535 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMANNA UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $2,680 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,282 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOWING ROCK CARES: $1,162 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTARLIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Vining Center Inc: $980 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARKET PROJECT INC: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLEGACY MINISTRIES: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE MISSION INC: $515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN USA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESTORATION HOUSE WNC: $295 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST EMERGENCY PROVIDERS: $34 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoving On Purpose: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEEDS OF LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOWING ROCK CARES ↗
  • Who funds STARLIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Vining Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARKET PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ONE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN USA ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATION HOUSE WNC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Servant FoundationKS12.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerome Daley Apostolic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerome Daley Apostolic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jerome Daley Apostolic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home