· Private foundation
Jerome & Anastasia Angel Charitable Tr
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of Jerome & Anastasia Angel Charitable Tr’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIZELL SENIOR CENTER | $50,000 |
| FEED ISRAEL | $10,000 |
| JEWISH NEVADA | $10,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LAS VEGAS | $5,000 |
| THREE SQUARE FOOD BANK | $4,500 |
| MARICI | $4,000 |
| BIKUR CHOLIM OF PALM SPRINGS | $3,600 |
| NPHY | $3,500 |
| GREEN BRONX MACHINE | $3,000 |
| ANIMAL CARE CENTERS NY | $2,000 |
| PALM SPRINGS ANIMAL SHELTER | $2,000 |
| CITY HARVEST | $2,000 |
| FOOD BANK INC DAYTON | $2,000 |
| OPERA LAS VEGAS | $2,000 |
| SICSA | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
53 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMIZELL CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $256k · revenue +26%
- CVCOACHELLA VALLEY REPERTORY4× · 2017–2020 · $106k · revenue +40%
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT7× · 2017–2023 · $36k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- SJST JUDE'Sone grant, 2022 · $3k
- OSOPERA SHOWCASE OF THE DESERTone grant, 2017 · $2k
- FOFRIENDS OF THE PS ANIMAL SHELTERone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…
Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
Guided by jewish values and in collaboration with the diverse communities we serve, jfcs east bay contributes to the resilience of communities, families, and individuals through advocacy and comprehensive support services at every stage of…
The coalition for the homeless is the nation's oldest advocacy and direct service organization helping homeless individuals and families. we believe that affordable housing, sufficient food and the chance to work for a living wage are…
To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.
Inspired by Jewish values and ideals, MAZON is a national advocacy organization working to end hunger among people of all faiths and backgrounds in the United States and Israel. See Schedule O for more details.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pegasus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Stroke Recovery Center dba Neuro Vitality Center ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY REPERTORY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE WELL IN THE DESERT INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
- Who funds DESERT ARC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN STREET ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds AIDS Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MARICI ↗
- Who funds FOOTSTEPS INC ↗
- Who funds DESERT BEST FRIENDS CLOSET ↗
- Who funds HEARTY START INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Society for the Improvement of Conditions for Stray Animals ↗
- Who funds DAYTON INTERNATIONAL PEACE MUSEUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Auen Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation · The Hyman and Mintz Family Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · Desert Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jerome & Anastasia Angel Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jerome & Anastasia Angel Charitable Tr?
Find your warmest path to Jerome & Anastasia Angel Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.