How much did THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

youthstudentseducationpreservevulnerableresearchcoachella valley

2020

laweducationcoachella valleypoorvulnerablefeedchildren

2021

educationvalleyfeedresearch

2022

keepeducationalfurthercoachella valley

2023

leadeducationalfightbuildcarebringchildren

2024

lawarteducationpreservebringchildrenfeed

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k23 grants · $52k
$10k–50k12 grants · $237k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

CITY OF HOPE$45,150
COACHELLA VALLEY REPERTORY$32,989
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT$26,013
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE DESERT$25,564
THE LIVING DESERT ZOO AND GARDENS$22,500
JOHN F KENNEDY FOUNDATION$16,424
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
LITERARY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT$11,595
PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF THE PHILHARMONIC$11,500
PEGASUS THERAPEUTIC RIDING$10,062
TOWERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION$10,000
MCCALLUM THEATRE$9,731
PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM$8,380
HIDDEN HARVEST$7,143

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 4.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 49 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

49 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+14%

Still filing today

41%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EM
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +44%
LS
LITERARY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT
8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +33%
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
3× · 2019–2023 · $34k · revenue +85%

Funded once

CO
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -10%
SH
SUMMIT HIGH SCHOOL
one grant, 2018 · $3k
IY
INEZ YANEZ
one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber was organized to strengthen business and commerce by promoting economic development in Palm Springs and the Coachella Valley.

—

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber

We are a unified voice advocating for a strong business community and a vibrant economy.

Community Improvement

Disability Rights California

Drc defends, advances, and strengthens the rights & opportunities of people with disabilities.

Civil Rights

Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy

California Dental Association

Cda is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement

Jewish Family Service of the Desert

To provide for the social service needs of the jewish and general community throughout the greater coachella valley with a commitment to promote the well being of persons of all ages, income and lifesytles. it accomplishes its purpose by…

Human Services

California College of the Arts

To educate students of diverse backgrounds in areas of fine arts, architecture, design, & writing.

Education

California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech

The American Institute of Architects

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—

Coachella Valley Rescue Mission

The mission is an oasis, a place of refuge for the homeless and needy in the coachella valley. it is a safe haven, a place of rest for the weary, and a place where daily physical and spiritual needs may be met.

Human Services

Friends of the Desert Mountains

The mission of the friends of the desert mountains is to preserve land, to support education, conservation and research in the coachella valley, and to act as the support organization for the santa rosa & san jacinto mountains national…

Animals

Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

We provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life alone.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Palm Springs Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/29

the rest of the field

12%

22,290/186,949

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

28/29

Grantees still filing

18/29

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,041,255Health$188,290Arts & Culture$72,841Youth Development$33,965Human Services$30,552Education$29,000International$13,028

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · The Auen Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Charity Works · The Coeta and Donald Barker · Regional Access Project Foundation · Highland Street Connection · The Champions Volunteer Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ACT FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 330880635 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ACT FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Hyman and Mintz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hyman and Mintz Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Hyman and Mintz Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE HYMAN AND MINTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Hyman and Mintz Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph