Skip to content
Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee) at a glance

· Private foundation

Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$134kHousing & Shelter$116kEnvironment$91kReligion$91kHuman Services$86kAnimals$72kHealth$42kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,750
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCARBOROUGH LAND CONSERVATION TRUST (SCARBOROUGH LAND TRUST)$10,605
NATURE CONSERVANCY (WASHINGTON CHAPTER)$7,500
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC (FUND FOR NATURE)$6,000
ST FRANCIS HOUSE$5,125
VASSAR COLLEGE$4,100
SPENCE SCHOOL$4,100
LOYOLA SCHOOL$4,100
AHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC$4,100
ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA CHURCH$4,100
GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$4,000
THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING CHARITABLE CORPORATION$3,280
INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$3,280
SAFEPLACE$2,750
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEW YORK$2,460
USA EAST PROVINCE OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS$2,460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $4k → 17%SAFEPLACE: $10k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $4k → 16%SAFEPLACE: $8k → 9%SAFEPLACE: $3k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $3k → 16%SAFEPLACE: $3k → 9%SAFEPLACE: $3k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%SAFEPLACE: $2k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $2k → 17%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
MA
IN
OH
CO
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$642k · 29 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
3

Total granted

$642k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+540%

Still filing today

52%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $71k · revenue +125%
  • GO
    GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +102%
  • TS
    THE SPENCE SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • Rocky Mountain Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +227%
  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVATORY (WASHINGTN CHAPTER)
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IW
    INTERFAITH WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +540%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling Charitable Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Sidewalk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC (FUND FOR NATURE): $49,255 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC (FUND FOR NATURE)LOYOLA SCHOOL: $33,580 · OtherLOYOLA SCHOOLST IGNATIUS LOYOLA CHURCH: $33,580 · OtherST IGNATIUS LOYOLA CHURCHVASSAR COLLEGE: $33,580 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGENATURE CONSERVANCY (WASHINGTON CHAPTER): $30,125 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY (WASHINGTON CHAPTER)INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $26,860 · OtherINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCNEW YORK FOUNDLING CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $20,360 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDLING CHARITABLE CORPORATIONCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEW YORK: $20,145 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEW YORKEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION EFAA: $18,975 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $17,195 · OtherUSA NORTHEAST PROVINCE OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS: $15,285 · OtherMARYKNOLL FATHERS & BROTHERS (CATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY OF AMERICA): $13,430 · Other+9 more: $65,108 · Other+9 moreSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $70,820 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE IN…SAFEPLACE: $27,167 · Human ServicesSAFEPLACEPINE STREET INN INC: $16,495 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INCSEARCH AND CARE INC: $13,430 · Human ServicesSEARCH AND CARE INCNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $33,580 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,715 · EducationGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35,935 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsAHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC: $33,580 · PhilanthropyScarborough Land Conservation Trust: $31,885 · EnvironmentTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $9,000 · InternationalAMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS: $7,970 · Health
Other$377,478Human Services$134,412Education$40,295Animals$36,935Philanthropy$33,580Environment$31,885International$9,000Health$7,970

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $70,820 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35,935 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $33,580 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $33,580 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC: $33,580 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetScarborough Land Conservation Trust: $31,885 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSAFEPLACE: $27,167 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $26,860 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $17,195 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $16,495 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC: $13,430 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSidewalk: $8,528 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $8,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS: $7,970 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,715 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH WORKS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROUTS NECK AUDUBON SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Scarborough Land Conservation Trust ↗
  • Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING CHARITABLE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Sidewalk ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds PROUTS NECK AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home