· Private foundation
Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee)
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCARBOROUGH LAND CONSERVATION TRUST (SCARBOROUGH LAND TRUST) | $10,605 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY (WASHINGTON CHAPTER) | $7,500 |
| MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC (FUND FOR NATURE) | $6,000 |
| ST FRANCIS HOUSE | $5,125 |
| AHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC | $4,100 |
| SPENCE SCHOOL | $4,100 |
| VASSAR COLLEGE | $4,100 |
| ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA CHURCH | $4,100 |
| LOYOLA SCHOOL | $4,100 |
| GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $4,000 |
| THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING CHARITABLE CORPORATION | $3,280 |
| INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $3,280 |
| SAFEPLACE | $2,750 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NEW YORK | $2,460 |
| USA EAST PROVINCE OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS | $2,460 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC8× · 2018–2025 · $71k · revenue +125%
- GOGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE8× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +102%
- TSTHE SPENCE SCHOOL8× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +17%
Funded once
Rocky Mountain Institutegraduatedone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +227%- NCNATURE CONSERVATORY (WASHINGTN CHAPTER)one grant, 2019 · $7k
- IWINTERFAITH WORKSgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +540%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
(see schedule o)
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling Charitable Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Sidewalk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds AHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Scarborough Land Conservation Trust ↗
- Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING CHARITABLE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds Sidewalk ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH WORKS ↗
- Who funds PROUTS NECK AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jerolamon Charitable Trust (C/O John H Edmondson Trustee) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.