Skip to content
Jensen Trust Norman L at a glance

· Private foundation

Jensen Trust Norman L

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$69kRecreation & Sports$52kReligion$35kHuman Services$34kHousing & Shelter$27kYouth Development$20kHealth$20kPhilanthropy$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$708k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE BROWN COUNTY LIBRARY$14,000
AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF BROWN COUNTY$10,000
NEW MASONIC CENTER$5,000
GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BEJA SHRINERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAUL'S PANTRY: $17k → 10%FRIENDS OF BAY BEACH INC: $14k → 10%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $11k → 10%FALL PREVENTION ALLIANCE OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN: $7k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $6k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $6k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%HSHS ST VINCENT ST MARY'S FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $6k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $6k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $4k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $4k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $4k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $4k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $4k → 10%BEJA SHRINE TEMPLE: $4k → 10%NORTHEAST WISCONSIN ZOO: $6k → 10%NORTHEAST WISCONSIN ZOO: $6k → 10%NORTHEAST WISCONSIN ZOO: $4k → 10%NORTHEAST WISCONSIN ZOO: $4k → 10%NEW ZOO: $4k → 10%NEW ZOO: $4k → 10%NEW ZOO: $4k → 10%NEW ZOO: $5k → 10%ST JOHN'S MINISTRIES: $16k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE BROWN COUNTY LIBRARY: $14k → 10%CASA OF BROWN COUNTY: $11k → 10%GREEN BAY POLICE FOUNDATION: $11k → 10%AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF BROWN COUNTY: $10k → 10%BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY: $8k → 10%HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER GREEN BAY: $17k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $7k → 10%NEW MASONIC CENTER: $6k → 10%NEW MASONIC CENTER: $6k → 10%NEW MASONIC CENTER: $5k → 10%GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%BEJA SHRINERS: $5k → 10%NEW MASONIC CENTER: $4k → 10%NEW MASONIC CENTER: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 6 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$195k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

33%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +7%
  • NM
    NEW MASONIC CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k
  • HH
    HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue -44%

Funded once

  • PP
    PAUL'S PANTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +27%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER GREEN BAY
    one grant, 2019 · $17k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brown County Farm Bureau

To improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life.

—
2
New Community Shelter Foundation Inc

New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.

Housing & Shelter
3
Brown County Developmental Services

Create opportunities for adults with disabilities

Human Services
4
Bethany Home Inc

Bethany is a faith-based, non-profit senior living community proving a nurturing christian environment and continuum of care that responds to individual needs and choices at all life stages.

—
5
St John's Lutheran Home

To provide physical, emotional, social and christian care for all people, with dignity and respect, in an environment of god's grace.

Health
6
Senior Advocacy Services

Senior advocacy services promotes the health, dignity, rights and quality of life of seniors and disabled in the north bay.

Health
7
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
8
Brown County United Way

Brown county united way unites people, ideas, and resources to create community solutions that strengthen every person and every community in brown county.

Philanthropy
9
Glenhaven Inc

To provide therapeutic, preventative, and restorative care to our residents that will assist them to obtain and maintain an optimum level of health and well-being.

Health
10
Friendship Hill

Residential home for the aged

—
11
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

—
12
Brown Neurology Inc

To develop and maintain the department of clinical neurosciences at the warren alpert medical school of brown university and its affiliated hospitals as one of the premier departments in new england.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ecumenical Partnership for Housing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Hill Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $41,000 · OtherGREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONNEW MASONIC CENTER: $41,000 · OtherNEW MASONIC CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER GREEN BAY: $17,000 · OtherWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER GREEN BAYFriends of the Brown County Library Inc: $14,000 · OtherFriends of the Brown County Library IncFRIENDS OF BAY BEACH INC: $14,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BAY BEACH INCGREEN BAY POLICE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $11,000 · OtherAGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF BROWN COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $19,000 · Other+3 moreHERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 · Recreation & SportsHERITAGE HI…ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $8,000 · HealthFall Prevention Alliance of Northeas: $7,000 · HealthEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $2,000 · HealthCASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC: $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$255,000Recreation & Sports$36,000Housing & Shelter$27,000Food & Nutrition$17,000Health$17,000Crime & Legal$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $41,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetHERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFriends of the Brown County Library Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREEN BAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Brown County Library Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fall Prevention Alliance of Northeas ↗
  • Who funds BEJA SHRINERS ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay Com…Green Bay Packers Fou…John and Engrid Meng …Weyers Family Foundat…De Pere Christian Out…Little Rapids Corpora…Charles Family Founda…K C Stock Foundation …Cornerstone Foundatio…Schreiber Foods Found…Wisconsin Public Serv…Baird Foundation Inc
Greater Green Bay Community Foundation IncWI25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Weyers Family Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Charles Family Foundation Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jensen Trust Norman L funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jensen Trust Norman L. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jensen Trust Norman L’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home