· Private foundation
Jd Nelson and Debra Nelson Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $292k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $455k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REDEEMER BIBLE CHURCH | $100,000 |
| PLYMOUTH BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH | $80,000 |
| WORLD HARVEST OUTREACH | $65,000 |
| OPEN BIBLE CHURCH | $59,500 |
| INFAITH | $50,000 |
| TRINITY ACADEMY INC | $50,000 |
| CLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL | $50,000 |
| GOSERV GLOBAL INC | $30,000 |
| CLEAR LAKE COMMUNITY SHOOLS | $27,000 |
| RIVER CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH | $25,000 |
| SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| ST JOHNS LUTHERAN SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| YOUTH HORIZONS | $25,000 |
| MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA | $25,000 |
| TOGETHER FOR GOOD | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL INCORPORATED3× · 2022–2024 · $115k · revenue +76%
- SCSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL INC2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +15%
- YHYOUTH HORIZONS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- IRIOWA REGULAR BAPTIST CAMP INCone grant, 2023 · $20k
- CLCLEAR LAKE COMMUNITY SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $16k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Christian leadership alliance exists to equip and unite leaders called to transform the world for christ.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…
To communicate the life changing message of jesus christ to every young person, giving them the opportunity to make an informed decision to become a follower of jesus christ.
The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Infaith and the most unlike its peers is The Martin and Osa Johnson Safari Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INFAITH ↗
- Who funds TRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds GOSERV GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YOUTH MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN LIGHTS ALLIANCE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Onelink International Inc ↗
- Who funds BETHEL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC ↗
- Who funds SERVING WORKERS FOR THE HARVEST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Servant Foundation · Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W · Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The David & Phyllis Murphy Charitable Foundation · United Way of North Central Iowa · Tomson Family Foundation Trust · Farrer Endowment Foundation · John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jd Nelson and Debra Nelson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jd Nelson and Debra Nelson Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jd Nelson and Debra Nelson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.