Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jay L Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$861kEducation$256kAnimals$192kFood & Nutrition$174kRecreation & Sports$148kPublic Safety & Disaster$132kCrime & Legal$128kHousing & Shelter$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$13,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLENNER MEMORY CARE$35,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE CENTER$35,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FUND$35,000
MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB$15,000
NCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$13,000
FALLEN OFFICERS FUND OF DOUGLAS COUNTY$13,000
RESPITE FOR ALL FOUNDATION (RAF)$13,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
CANCER WELLNESS FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AL$13,000
4 PAWS 4 LIFE RESCUE$10,000
MONTGOMERY AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
BILL MYERS BACKPACK PROGRAM$10,000
SERVICE DOGS OF ALABAMA$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
MONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $4k → 12%MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $15k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $10k → 18%MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $10k → 18%MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $10k → 18%MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $10k → 18%MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
UT
CO
SC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 30 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
16

Total granted

$2.0M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+50%

Still filing today

30%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +40%
  • SD
    SERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +52%
  • 4P
    4 Paws 4 Life Rescue
    7× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CITRUS & THE NATURE COAST INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -94%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mobile County Pals

Provide services and support to prevent cruelty and provide shelter to animals

Animals
2
Animal Rescue Foundation

To help stray animals find homes

Animals
3
Tails From Alabama

Rescue Dogs from Alabama

Animals
4
Friends of Dekalb County-Al Animal Adoption Center

Animal adoption and care

—
5
Full Circle Rescue and Sanctuary

The mission of full circle rescue and sanctuary is to provide assistance to animals in need through rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption. full circle is a 501(c)(3) foster based animal rescue and sanctuary in central alabama, operated by a…

Animals
6
Alabama Animal Adoption Society

To help strays and unwanted family pets find loving and responsible homes and to educate the public regarding the problem of pet overpopulation and the importance of spaying and neutering their pets.

Animals
7
Cavalier Rescue of Alabama Inc

Rescue of cavalier king charles spaniels in need of reuniting, rehabilitating, and/or rehoming.

Animals
8
Alabama Angels Dog Rescue Inc

Not for profit, literary rescue of dogs

Animals
9
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
10
Miles to Freedom Animal Rescue

Our mission is to save dogs from overpopulated shelters and areas across the southern parts of the United States.

Animals
11
Department of Alabama Amvets Inc

Assistance to veterans especially in alabama

Public Benefit
12
Lifeline Pet Rescue of North Alabama Inc

To promote responsible pet ownership promote the humane treatment of domestic animals, to place homeless animals, and for the benefit of the community as determined by

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Service Dogs Alabama Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brain Injury Association of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLENNER MEMORY CARE: $218,000 · OtherGLENNER MEMORY CAREBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FUND: $188,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FUNDNCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $142,000 · OtherNCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONFALLEN OFFICERS FUND OF DOUGLAS COUNTY: $116,500 · OtherFALLEN OFFICERS FUND OF DOUGLAS COUNTYBILL MYERS BACKPACK PROGRAM: $92,250 · OtherBILL MYERS BACKPACK PROGRAMROCKY MOUNTAIN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE CENTER: $86,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE CENTERRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $85,250 · OtherCANCER WELLNESS FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AL: $77,500 · OtherJONES SCHOOL OF LAW: $75,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $74,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ENDOWMENT FUND: $64,500 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - THE RESPITE MINISTRY: $57,000 · OtherTHE ALABAMA MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $54,000 · Other+20 more: $278,050 · Other+20 moreSERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC: $66,250 · AnimalsSERVICE DOGS…4 Paws 4 Life Rescue: $62,500 · Animals4 Paws 4 Lif…DANNY & RONS RESCUE: $56,000 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS…MONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY: $52,000 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY H…HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $81,500 · Food & NutritionMONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $55,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesALABAMA SENIOR OLYMPICS INC: $51,500 · Recreation & SportsRESPITE FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $30,500 · HealthBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO: $20,500 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationMONTGOMERY SUNRISE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,609,050Animals$236,750Food & Nutrition$81,500Human Services$67,000Recreation & Sports$51,500Health$51,000Education$6,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $81,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC: $66,250 over 9y, 2.8% of budget4 Paws 4 Life Rescue: $62,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $56,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB: $55,500 over 6y, 66% of budgetMONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY: $52,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetRESPITE FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO: $20,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF CITRUS & THE NATURE COAST INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds 4 Paws 4 Life Rescue ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY BICYCLE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RESPITE FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CITRUS & THE NATURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John and Joyce Caddell FoundationAL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John and Joyce Caddell Foundation · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc · The Landa Fund · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Hobbs Foundation · The J K Lowder Family Foundation · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jay L Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jay L Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jay L Smith Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jay L Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jay L Smith Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph