Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jay and Sarah Flatley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$3.0MPhilanthropy$1.4MScience & Tech$1.3MHealth$250kSocial Science$155kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$15kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $675k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANA$500,000
SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES$250,000
CLAREMONT-MCKENNA COLLEGE$200,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$175,000
U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$100,000
SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES$50,000
CENTER FOR AMERICAN GREATNESS INC$50,000
U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$50,000
SCRIPPS HEALTH$50,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$25,000
CLAREMONT-MCKENNA COLLEGE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPECIAL OPERATION CARE FUND INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CA
MD
AZ
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 33% of Jay and Sarah Flatley Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jay and Sarah Flatley Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.4M · 10 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$4.4M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+21%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechSocial ScienceArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Claremont McKenna College
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +44%
  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +27%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $530k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • GA
    GENETIC ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -52%
  • WE
    WINE EDUCATION COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -88%
  • SF
    SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +65%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
6
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Charity League Inc San Diego Del Norte Chapter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr13%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr11%1%35–55yr13%58%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,957

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Claremont McKenna College — $1,232,500 · OtherClaremont McKenna CollegeUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - SCHOOL OF LETT — $325,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA -…CATHOLIC SECONDARY EDUCATION- DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO INCORPORATED — $300,000 · OtherCATHOLIC SECONDARY EDUCATION- DIOCE…+5 more — $47,000 · OtherGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $1,350,000 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTH…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $530,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIO…TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $475,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVER…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · Education+1 more — $15,000 · EducationThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $1,190,000 · Science & TechThe Salk Institute for…+1 more — $3,000 · Science & TechSCRIPPS HEALTH — $177,000 · HealthGENETIC ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthCenter for American Greatness Inc — $155,000 · Social ScienceLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,904,500Philanthropy$1,351,000Education$1,220,000Science & Tech$1,193,000Health$228,000Social Science$155,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $1,350,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College — $1,232,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $1,190,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $530,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $475,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $177,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for American Greatness Inc — $155,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGENETIC ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWINE EDUCATION COUNCIL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC San Diego Del Norte Chapter — $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN15.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The San Diego Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jay and Sarah Flatley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Genetic Alliance Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jay and Sarah Flatley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jay and Sarah Flatley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph