Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jastrow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$486kReligion$354kHealth$181kPublic Benefit$175kHousing & Shelter$25kPhilanthropy$18kArts & Culture$15kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$814k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$50,000
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD$20,000
ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION$10,000
PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,000
STEPHEN F AUSTIN SOCIETY$5,000
EPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWEST$2,500
DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION-GRANDPARENTS TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HILL COUNTRY SCIENCE MILL: $5k → 8%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%Children's Medical Center Foundation of Central Texas-Grandparents Club: $1k → 10%Hill Country Science Mill: $5k → 8%HILL COUNTRY SCIENCE MILL: $5k → 8%TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $25k → 10%TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $25k → 10%TEXAS TRIBUNE: $25k → 10%TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $25k → 10%Texas Tribune: $25k → 10%TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $25k → 10%TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $25k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%GREATER AUSTIN CRIME COMMISSION: $5k → 10%AUSTIN SPORTS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%St David's Foundation Community Fund: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S COMMUNITY FUND: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%Good Shepherd Episcopal Church-Building the Beloved Community: $50k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30k → 10%Good Shepherd Episcopal Church: $24k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20k → 10%AUSTIN HIGH FOOTBALL BOOSTERS INC: $15k → 10%AUSTIN HIGH SCHOOL TENNIS BOOSTERS: $5k → 10%STEPHEN F AUSTIN SOCIETY: $5k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $13k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%Peoples Community Clinic: $10k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%PEOPLES COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%Austin Community College Foundation: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
-19%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TEXAS TRIBUNE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $175k · revenue +118%
  • PC
    PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +82%
  • SD
    ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • GS
    Good Shepherd Episcopal Church-Building the Beloved Community
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • UO
    University of Texas Subiendo
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • KF
    KKG FoundationBeta Xi KKG House Project-Austin
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
2
Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

The foundation is committed to serving charitable needs both domestically and abroad through charitable grants and services at the discretion of the board of trustees.

Philanthropy
3
Baylor Oral Health Foundation

The baylor oral health foundation was established to foster and support the activities and program of the texas a&m university college of dentistry (the college) to provide financial support for excellence at the college, and to advance…

Health
4
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
5
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
6
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
9
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
10
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
11
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
12
Anesthesiologists for Children

Provide anesthesia services to patients at children's medical center of dallas. these services are provided without regard to a patient's ability to pay for the services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dell Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Science Mill. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $400,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINGOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $194,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL CHURCHEPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $70,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWESTGood Shepherd Episcopal Church-Building the Beloved Community: $50,000 · OtherGood Shepherd Episcopal Church-Building the Beloved CommunityUniversity of Texas Subiendo: $50,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas SubiendoTHE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $40,000 · Other+8 more: $66,500 · Other+8 moreTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $175,000 · EducationTEXAS TRIBUNE INCAustin Community College Foundation: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $92,500 · HealthPEOPLE'S COMMUN…ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthST DAVID'S FOUN…ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 · HealthST DAVID'S FOUN…CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthSCIENCE MILL: $15,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$870,500Education$190,000Health$178,500Arts & Culture$15,000Philanthropy$7,500Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $92,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE MILL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAustin Community College Foundation: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE MILL ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds Austin Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jastrow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jastrow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jastrow Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jastrow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jastrow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph