Skip to content
Jaquith Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jaquith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$580k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$636kHealth$229kHuman Services$190kEducation$117kPhilanthropy$58kInternational$46kHousing & Shelter$38kFood & Nutrition$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $401k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grand Teton Music Festival$100,000
One 22$100,000
Off Square Theater Co$51,000
St Johns Hospital Foundation$50,250
Jackson Hole Center for the Arts$50,000
First in Family$50,000
Teton Youth and Family Services$45,000
Planned Parenthood of IL$33,000
Oxfam America$33,000
Community Foundation of Jackson Hole$31,550
Food Bank of Wyoming$10,000
Williams College$7,500
Mount Holyoke College$5,000
MUSC Foundation$5,000
Colorado College$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%One 22: $100k → 5%One 22: $10k → 5%One 22: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
WY
CT
CO
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 23 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

65%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +447%
  • SJ
    St John's Health Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $111k · revenue +482%
  • TY
    TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2025 · $83k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity Greater Teton
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • HF
    Hole Food Rescue
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • JH
    Jackson Hold Center for the Arts
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole; the most unlike its peers is The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jackson Hole Center for the Arts: $170,000 · OtherJackson Hole Center for the ArtsOff Square Theater Co: $142,000 · OtherOff Square Theater CoFirst in Family: $74,000 · OtherFirst in FamilyPlanned Parenthood of IL: $33,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of ILHabitat for Humanity Greater Teton: $25,000 · OtherHole Food Rescue: $20,000 · Other+21 more: $98,250 · Other+21 moreGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $275,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVA…CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEAT…St John's Health Foundation: $110,500 · HealthSt John's Healt…TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $82,500 · HealthTETON YOUTH AND…One22 Inc: $115,000 · Human ServicesOne22 IncWilliams College: $37,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $20,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $15,000 · Education+3 more: $4,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $47,850 · PhilanthropyASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $33,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $12,500 · International
Other$562,250Arts & Culture$305,000Health$193,000Human Services$115,000Education$106,500Philanthropy$55,350International$45,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $275,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOne22 Inc: $115,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $110,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $82,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $47,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $37,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $33,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHole Food Rescue: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTETON LITERACY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAstoria Park Conservancy: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChiArts Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds One22 Inc ↗
  • Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Hole Food Rescue ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STRATFORD SHAKESPEAREAN FESTIVAL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds TETON LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Astoria Park Conservancy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Ladd Family Found…The Brooks FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…The Jwj Family Founda…Kenneth and Caroline …Hughes Charitable Fou…Hughes Charitable Fou…Perkins Charitable Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Greater Houston Commu…National Philanthropi…
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Ladd Family Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Jwj Family Foundation Inc · Kenneth and Caroline Taylor Family Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Perkins Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jaquith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jaquith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jaquith Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home