Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kenneth and Caroline Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of KENNETH AND CAROLINE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $374k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $376k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
$6,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUTHRIE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$1,060,000
WYALUSING VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$500,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART$275,000
Individual grant recipient$115,000
GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL$100,000
WYALUSING AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$60,500
BLAIR ACADEMY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT$50,000
CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS$50,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$45,600
NEW HARTFORD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE$40,000
PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE$31,000
WYALUSING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,084
JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST$25,000
HOPS AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION$25,000
CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $20k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $15k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $15k → 15%SUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY: $10k → 12%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%SUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY: $10k → 12%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
NY
WY
PA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Kenneth and Caroline Taylor Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kenneth and Caroline Taylor Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 71 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

71 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
18

Total granted

$8.6M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+1%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $738k · revenue +83%
  • JH
    JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $372k · revenue +40%
  • GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BRADFORD COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • WC
    WYOMING COUNTY CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • TT
    THE TVRC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wyldlife Fund

To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.

Animals
2
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
3
Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.

Environment
4
Trout Unlimited Jackson Hole 051

Jhtu was formed in 1983 in jackson, wyoming, to conserve, protect, and restore jackson hole's coldwater fisheries and their watersheds. currently jhtu has a membershp of 410 jackson hole residents and others concerned about the precious…

Animals
5
Wyoming Assoc of Conservation Districts

The wyoming association of conservation districts provides leadership for the conservation of wyoming's soil and water resources through a responsible conservation ethic.

—
6
Wyoming Wilderness Association

The wyoming wilderness association works to protect wyoming's public wild lands to ensure a future of wild places for people and wildlife.

Animals
7
Westmoreland Land Trust

To conserve and steward lands and waters of Westmoreland County that harbor ecological, cultural or recreational qualities to offer a healthier and more sustainable future for all.

Environment
8
Rendezvous Lands Conservancy

To improve the quality of life in rural intermountain west communities by protecting, owning, and creating locally significant keystone conservation properties as public access parks.

Environment
9
Jackson Hole Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county

—
10
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
11
The Clearwater Conservancy of Central Pennsylvania Inc

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment
12
Wallowa Land Trust

Our mission is to protect the rural nature of Wallowa County by working cooperatively with private landowners,indigenous people, local communities and governmental entities to conserve land.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development and Educa…Early Childhood Care CentersFamily Philanthropic Founda…Labor UnionsYouth Sports LeaguesHospital Systems and Medica…Hartford Community Developm…Regional Economic Developme…Local Libraries and Histori…Senior Care & Health Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr12%8%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr21%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%8%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr14%35%35–55yr21%10%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/68
the rest of the field
9%
683/7,555

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
51/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GUTHRIE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM — $2,275,000 · OtherGUTHRIE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMWYALUSING VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO — $1,023,000 · OtherWYALUSING VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIRE COIndividual grant recipient — $726,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWYALUSING AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $431,250 · OtherWYALUSING AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT+55 more — $1,257,848 · Other+55 moreNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES — $738,250 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM …WYALUSING VALLEY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $284,329 · Arts & CultureWYALUSING VALLEY…GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $220,500 · Arts & CultureGRAND TETON MUSI…+4 more — $46,010 · Arts & CultureJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST — $372,000 · EnvironmentJACKSON H…PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC — $181,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT O…RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY — $81,000 · EnvironmentRUFFED GR…NORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST — $70,000 · EnvironmentNORTH BRA…+4 more — $35,000 · EnvironmentWYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $143,000 · EducationWyalusing Area Education Foundation — $123,000 · EducationBLAIR ACADEMY — $90,000 · EducationWYALUSING PUBLIC LIBRARY — $75,000 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGE — $45,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $40,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College — $30,000 · Education+2 more — $17,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $303,087 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY — $90,000 · PhilanthropyEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $9,500 · PhilanthropyCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY — $110,000 · Human ServicesWings of Hope Equitherapy — $45,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY — $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS — $65,500 · Food & NutritionHUNTERS SHARING THE HARVEST INC — $45,000 · Food & NutritionFORK OVER LOVE INC — $27,000 · Food & NutritionHELPING HANDS FOOD PANTRY — $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,713,598Arts & Culture$1,289,089Environment$739,000Education$563,000Philanthropy$437,587Human Services$195,000Food & Nutrition$143,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES — $738,250 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST — $372,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $303,087 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWYALUSING VALLEY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $284,329 over 9y, 67% of budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $220,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC — $181,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetWYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $143,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWyalusing Area Education Foundation — $123,000 over 9y, 34% of budgetJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM — $120,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY — $110,000 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation — $90,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBRADFORD COUNTY ACTION INC — $90,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY — $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY — $81,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWYALUSING PUBLIC LIBRARY — $75,000 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetNORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST — $70,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetThe Childrens House — $65,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS — $65,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUNTERS SHARING THE HARVEST INC — $45,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetWings of Hope Equitherapy — $45,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetH O P S AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION — $32,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In — $28,750 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetFORK OVER LOVE INC — $27,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetWYOMING COUNTY CULTURAL CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY — $20,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetABUSE & RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRADFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $13,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetENDLESS MOUNTAIN MISSION CENTER — $12,500 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetTETON LITERACY CENTER — $12,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWILMOT FIRE COMPANY — $11,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE TVRC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH FOU — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE TWIN TIERS — $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOFF SQUARE THEATRE COMPANY — $7,510 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBRADFORD COUNTY REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 534 — $6,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE MASTER'S SCHOOL — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOOD PANTRY — $6,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds WYALUSING VALLEY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Wyalusing Area Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRADFORD COUNTY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WYALUSING PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens House ↗
  • Who funds CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds HUNTERS SHARING THE HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Wings of Hope Equitherapy ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds H O P S AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds Northern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In ↗
  • Who funds FORK OVER LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BRADFORD COUNTY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Community Foundation …United Way of Bradfor…Allone CharitiesTuscarora Wayne Mutua…Sordoni Family Founda…Firstenergy FoundationAllone FoundationThe Free Lunch Founda…The Brooks FoundationTioga Downs Regional …The Blackhorse Founda…The Wilson Family Fou…
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY35.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · United Way of Bradford County · Allone Charities · Tuscarora Wayne Mutual Foundation · Sordoni Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Allone Foundation · The Free Lunch Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · The Blackhorse Foundation · The Wilson Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kenneth and Caroline Taylor Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Blair Academy — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines