Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James Purdy Barrow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$340k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$5.4MHealth$1.1MReligion$666kHuman Services$290kArts & Culture$185kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St John's Episcopal School$100,000
Robert E Lee Academy$100,000
University of S Carolina School of$40,000
The Living Church Foundation$25,000
Salvation Army Georgetown$25,000
Alcuin School$25,000
The Hockaday School$15,400
Smith Medical Clinic$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Incarnation House: $50k → 14%Incarnation House: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 64% of James Purdy Barrow Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 85% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

James Purdy Barrow Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 13 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$3.1M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+0%

Still filing today

46%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $800k · revenue +67%
  • AS
    ALCUIN SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $125k · revenue +13%
  • SM
    SMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • University of South Carolina Educational Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $2.0M · revenue +0%
  • TH
    Texas Health Resources Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE
    one grant, 2018 · $1.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
4
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

9
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
12
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Butterflies Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE — $1,000,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLEUniversity of S Carolina Education — $810,000 · OtherUniversity of S Carolina EducationLEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC — $800,000 · OtherLEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INCCHURCH OF THE INCARNATION — $551,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE INCARNATIONUniversity of S Carolina School of — $165,000 · OtherLee County Art CouncilBishopville O — $150,500 · OtherSt Philip's School — $150,000 · Other+13 more — $630,000 · Other+13 moreUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $2,000,000 · EducationUniversity of South Carolina Edu…ALCUIN SCHOOL — $125,000 · EducationALCUIN SCHOOLLUMIN EDUCATION — $75,000 · Education+1 more — $15,400 · EducationTexas Health Resources Foundation — $1,000,000 · HealthTexas Health R…+2 more — $7,000 · HealthEVERY AVENUE — $75,000 · Human ServicesBUTTERFLIES USA INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesLiving Church Foundation Inc — $55,000 · ReligionDallas Museum of Art — $25,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,256,500Education$2,215,400Health$1,007,000Human Services$80,000Religion$55,000Arts & Culture$29,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $2,000,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC — $800,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetALCUIN SCHOOL — $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLUMIN EDUCATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEVERY AVENUE — $75,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetLiving Church Foundation Inc — $55,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL — $15,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTTERFLIES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetHISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE
  • Who funds LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC
  • Who funds ALCUIN SCHOOL
  • Who funds LUMIN EDUCATION
  • Who funds EVERY AVENUE
  • Who funds Living Church Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art
  • Who funds SMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds BUTTERFLIES USA INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX17.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · The Rosewood Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James Purdy Barrow Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James Purdy Barrow Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James Purdy Barrow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph