Skip to content

South Carolina · Nonprofit

LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC

LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC (South Carolina) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $814,036 to it, the largest being James Purdy Barrow Foundation ($800,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.9M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$814k
Net assets
$1.9M
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Lee Academy of Bishopville Inc does

Mission

Lee Academys mission is to provide quality private education for students from grades K-3 through senior year of high school.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Education funds - provides a quality education for grades k3-12. The schools curriculm includes math, science, english, reading, writing, history, physical education and social studies fro 491 students.

    $2,090,333 spentof which $386,473 as grants$1,967,289 earned by the program
    86% of program spending
  2. Remaining programs

    $185,355 spent$271,580 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  3. Activity fund - provides students the educational experience of participating in organizations such as school government, yearbook, and beta club, approximately 225 participants. See schedule o

    $160,125 spent$168,667 earned by the program
    7% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,435,813.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($1.8M)2018 Revenue 82 ($1.8M) Expenses 104 ($1.8M) Net assets 109 ($1.9M)2019 Revenue 84 ($1.8M) Expenses 107 ($1.9M) Net assets 107 ($1.9M)2020 Revenue 79 ($1.7M) Expenses 103 ($1.8M) Net assets 105 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 102 ($2.2M) Expenses 119 ($2.1M) Net assets 108 ($1.9M)2022 Revenue 119 ($2.6M) Expenses 140 ($2.4M) Net assets 121 ($2.1M)2023 Revenue 132 ($2.9M) Expenses 171 ($3.0M) Net assets 114 ($2.0M)2024 Revenue 129 ($2.8M) Expenses 153 ($2.7M) Net assets 120 ($2.1M)2025 Revenue 132 ($2.9M) Expenses 166 ($2.9M) Net assets 111 ($1.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (132)Expenses (166)Net assets (111)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.2M to $2.5M (+15%).

$2.0M
$2.1M
$2.0M
$2.2M
$2.2M
$2.5M
$2.3M
$2.5M
$2.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 0% · 2020 0% · 2021 3% · 2022 21% · 2023 18% · 2024 2% · 2025 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$426k
’17
−$42k
’18
−$47k
’19
−$89k
’20
$128k
’21
$144k
’22
−$117k
’23
$126k
’24
−$38k
’25
6.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed131413131313131212
Joined·+3+2+3+2+3+0+3+0
No longer listed·23323040
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $103k → $100k.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

98%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 97% · 2021 94% · 2022 98% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside South Carolina, across 3 states in all.

NC
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $759 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

SC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC?
LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC (South Carolina) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $814,036 to it, the largest being James Purdy Barrow Foundation ($800,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $814,036 in grants to LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC?
James Purdy Barrow Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $800,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LEE ACADEMY OF BISHOPVILLE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Lee Academy of Bishopville →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing