Skip to content

· Private foundation

James P Gills Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$3.1MYouth Development$2.0MEducation$131kHuman Services$125kInternational$104kHousing & Shelter$52kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER INC$50,000
FREE GRACE CHURCH$12,000
NEW HARVEST MISSION$12,000
SRL$12,000
LIVING WATER COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATI$10,000
ACTS FOUNDATION$9,600
CHARACTER GPS$8,000
JOSHUA GENERATION$7,400
LUIS PALAU ASSOCATION$6,000
FOCUS ON FAMILY$6,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH CHAPE$5,000
MAP INTERNATIONAL INC$5,000
FLORIDA PREBORN RESCUE$5,000
METRO WORLD CHILD$5,000
LOVING HANDS MINISTRIES$4,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 11%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $70k → 12%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $50k → 12%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 41 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
26

Total granted

$2.9M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+43%

Still filing today

39%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GALCOM INTERNATIONAL USA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +36%
  • METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $52k · revenue +97%
  • NH
    NEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $39k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M · revenue +12%
  • LH
    LESLIE HALE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2018 · $48k
  • FW
    FAITH WORLD INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
2
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
3
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
4
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
5
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
6
Faith Speaks World Outreach

World outreach

Religion
7
Faithbytheword Incorporated

As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…

Human Services
8
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
9
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
10
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
11
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
12
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Galcom International Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA: $2,000,000 · OtherYMCA+52 more: $770,875 · Other+52 moreThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $2,500,000 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperatin…Tarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $52,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesNEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $39,000 · ReligionForever Be Sure: $6,500 · ReligionLuis Palau Association: $6,500 · ReligionJOSHUA GENERATION INTERNATIONAL: $6,300 · ReligionFresh Start Ministries & Mentoring Inc: $5,050 · ReligionDesire Street Ministries: $5,000 · ReligionANGEL MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $3,000 · ReligionLIVING WATER COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalMAP International Inc: $15,000 · International+1 more: $240 · InternationalLAWS 2 LIVE BY INTERNATIONAL INC dba Character GPS: $15,000 · EducationFLORIDA PREBORN RESCUE INC: $5,000 · EducationGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC OF PASCO INC: $4,800 · Health
Other$2,770,875Philanthropy$2,500,000Human Services$177,000Religion$76,350International$35,240Education$20,000Health$4,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $2,500,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetTarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc: $120,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGALCOM INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $73,300 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $52,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACTS FOUNDATION INC: $33,500 over 5y, 30% of budgetLIVING WATER COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetMAP International Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $11,400 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetForever Be Sure: $6,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA PREBORN RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDesire Street Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF PINELLAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC OF PASCO INC: $4,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Tarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds GALCOM INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WATER COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWS 2 LIVE BY INTERNATIONAL INC dba Character GPS ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOVING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Forever Be Sure ↗
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA GENERATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Fresh Start Ministries & Mentoring Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA PREBORN RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS TRAINING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Desire Street Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James P Gills Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James P Gills Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida Preborn Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to James P Gills Foundation?

Find your warmest path to James P Gills Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James P Gills’ filings →

More from the funding graph