Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James and Lesley Anixter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$610kReligion$115kHealth$75kYouth Development$74kArts & Culture$57kInternational$46kCrime & Legal$11kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$430k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$100,000
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$6,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS - CHICAGO WOMEN'S BOARD$6,000
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES$6,000
AM SHALOM$5,500
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH$2,300
FRIENDS OF ELNET$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$2,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$2,000
ANIXTER CENTER - CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY DIVISION$2,000
CAMP GAN ISRAEL$1,800
KATHY'S HOUSE$1,000
GPF FOUNDATION$1,000
HELPING HANDS NETWORK$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DON'T EVEN GIVE UP INC: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7k → 17%BOCA FIDE: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENSE FORCES: $6k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5k → 17%RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $11k → 8%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5k → 17%RAVINIA: $9k → 8%RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 8%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 14%RAVINIA: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $6k → 14%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $6k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 14%AM SHALOM: $9k → 14%AM SHALOM: $7k → 14%AM SHALOM: $6k → 14%AM SHALOM: $6k → 14%AM SHALOM: $6k → 14%AM SHALOM: $5k → 14%AM SHALOM: $5k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS - CHICAGO WOMEN'S BOARD: $6k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $81k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $77k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $51k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $50k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND: $37k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS: $15k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS: $8k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS: $7k → 14%CAMP GAN ISRAEL: $5k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $16k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 14%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of James and Lesley Anixter Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

James and Lesley Anixter Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$946k · 27 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
37

Total granted

$946k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+3%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $596k · revenue +13%
  • JC
    JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +24%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • DE
    DON'T EVER GIVE UP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • JF
    JCCC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

2
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
4
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
5
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

6
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
9
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
10
Hillels of Illinois Endowment Foundation

The foundation was established exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, a not-for-profit organization.

Education
11
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
12
Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain the broad charitable, educational and/or religious purpose of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, and the foundation as authorized in…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Uptown Music Theater of Highland Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr13%11%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr22%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr15%3%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr22%80%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,311

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $595,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO+3 more — $11,950 · PhilanthropyAM SHALOM — $51,230 · OtherAM SHALOMRAVINIA — $31,500 · OtherRAVINIANORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER — $30,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HE…MISCELLANEOUS — $29,900 · OtherMISCELLANEOUSCAMP GAN ISRAEL — $21,300 · OtherCAMP GAN ISRAELFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $11,000 · OtherNORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC — $8,000 · Other+33 more — $52,620 · Other+33 moreJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $66,700 · Youth Development+1 more — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $22,900 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $6,600 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNET — $2,000 · InternationalRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $17,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,800 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $1,100 · Arts & CultureTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,250 · HealthDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC — $5,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $3,155 · HealthBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $2,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,000 · HealthADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthBeacon Health System Inc — $1,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC — $1,000 · HealthFoundation for Opthamological Care — $1,000 · HealthKathy's House Inc — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $7,000 · EducationSOLOMON SCHECHTER ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationJCCC FOUNDATION — $3,800 · EducationGPF FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES — $1,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Education
Philanthropy$607,450Other$235,550Youth Development$68,700International$31,500Arts & Culture$23,900Health$22,905Education$21,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $595,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $66,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $22,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $10,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER — $7,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $7,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $6,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON SCHECHTER ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJCCC FOUNDATION — $3,800 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $3,155 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGPF FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS NETWORK INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Keystone Foundation — $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeacon Health System Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Opthamological Care — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOCUS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENEE ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S DISEASE RESEARCH SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUptown Music Theater of Highland Park — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC
  • Who funds LESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER
  • Who funds JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DON'T EVER GIVE UP INC
  • Who funds SOLOMON SCHECHTER ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC
  • Who funds JCCC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
  • Who funds GPF FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS NETWORK INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET
  • Who funds BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds The Keystone Foundation
  • Who funds COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES
  • Who funds CHILDRENS BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Highland Park Community Foundation · First Bank Chicago Foundation · The Bill Bass Foundation · Kovler Family Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · YEA Highland Park Inc · Goodman Family Fund · Sam I Am Foundation · Jerrold Ruskin Foundation Inc · Healthcare Foundation of Highland Park · Mills Family Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James and Lesley Anixter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph