Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$865k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$172k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.0MHealth$1.1MEducation$517kYouth Development$447kAnimals$393kEmployment$386kRecreation & Sports$314kReligion$261kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $538k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
$34,430
Median grant
7
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES$172,150
CHEYENNE VILLAGE$51,645
GOODWILL OF COLORADO$51,645
PIKES PEAK HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE$43,037
THE SALVATION ARMY$43,037
COLORADO BOYS RANCH FOUNDATION$43,037
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$43,037
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$43,037
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$43,037
CHRISTIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC$43,037
HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIKES PEAK REGION$43,037
SPECIAL OLYMPICS CO$34,430
YMCA OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION$34,430
ST FRANCIS MISSION$21,146
DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION$17,215
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $970k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $19k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $18k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $17k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $16k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $14k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $11k → 15%DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $53k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $52k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $47k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $45k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $42k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $36k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $34k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $32k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $28k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $172k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $157k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $139k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
SD
CT
CO
MD
NM
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 29 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
1

Total granted

$6.4M
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-16%

Still filing today

52%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $468k · revenue +49%
  • GO
    Goodwill of Colorado
    9× · 2017–2025 · $386k · revenue +284%
  • CV
    Cheyenne Village
    9× · 2017–2025 · $369k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • SA
    SOUTH-EAST ASIAN RELIEF INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Set of Colorado Springs

S.e.t. of colorado springs is made up of a small multi-skilled staff and a large corps of volunteers, including many in the medical professions. s.e.t. of colorado springs collaborates with other care-givers in the pikes peak area to teach…

—
2
Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum

To build a lasting connection to the pikes peak region by preserving and sharing our cultural history. this mission is accomplished through our support of the colorado springs pioneers museum, owned and operated by the city of colorado…

Arts & Culture
3
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
4
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
5
Colorado State Fire Chiefs

The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
7
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
9
Pathways Hospice

Honoring every moment of life, pathways hospice provides compassionate, excellent, comprehensive care for those who have an advanced medical condition and those who are grieving.

Human Services
10
Sos Outreach

Sos outreach changes young lives, building character and leadership in underserved kids through mentoring outdoors.

Recreation & Sports
11
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
12
Pikes Peak Community Foundation

To inspire a passionate community to forge an enduring legacy now and for future generations. this mission is attained by building a community endowment, helping donors address community needs and providing philanthropic leadership.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is South-East Asian Relief Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $818,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $321,586 · OtherThe Christian Home For Children IncRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $321,586 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $321,586 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCHPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $321,586 · OtherPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INCST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $321,586 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOLTHE SALVATION ARMY: $321,586 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYYMCA OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $257,270 · OtherYMCA OF THE PIKES PEAK REGIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS CO: $252,091 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS CO+12 more: $765,063 · Other+12 moreSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $468,351 · Human ServicesSILVER KEY SENIOR…Cheyenne Village: $369,161 · Human ServicesCheyenne VillageDAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION INC: $132,111 · Human ServicesDAKOTA INDIAN FOU…COLORADO BOYS RANCH FOUNDATION: $321,586 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $128,637 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $321,586 · AnimalsCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $71,724 · AnimalsGoodwill of Colorado: $385,907 · EmploymentSt Francis Mission: $132,568 · ReligionColorado Springs Christian Schools: $66,282 · Education
Other$4,021,940Human Services$969,623Health$450,223Animals$393,310Employment$385,907Religion$132,568Education$66,282

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $468,351 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGoodwill of Colorado: $385,907 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCheyenne Village: $369,161 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $321,586 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $321,586 over 9y, 13% of budgetPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $321,586 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO BOYS RANCH FOUNDATION: $321,586 over 9y, 22% of budgetSt Francis Mission: $132,568 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetDAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION INC: $132,111 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $128,637 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $71,724 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Springs Christian Schools: $66,282 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $60,842 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE: $47,847 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $14,504 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH-EAST ASIAN RELIEF INC: $1,737 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill of Colorado ↗
  • Who funds Cheyenne Village ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds The Christian Home For Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds PIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO BOYS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Mission ↗
  • Who funds DAKOTA INDIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Springs Christian Schools ↗
  • Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH-EAST ASIAN RELIEF INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacqueline G Archer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph