Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$865k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Grants FY2025
26
Organizations funded FY2024
4%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$34,430
Largest grant, FY2025
$172,150
Organizations funded a year
26 to 27
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
7
Total assets, FY2025
$13M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 4% of the organizations Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving26$865k4%
FY202426$807k4%
FY202327$676k11%
FY202226$885k0%
FY202126$786k0%
FY202026$729k0%
FY201926$591k0%
FY201826$567k0%
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.0MHealth$1.1MEducation$517kYouth Development$447kAnimals$393kEmployment$386kRecreation & Sports$314kReligion$261kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
SD
CT
CO
MD
NM
TN
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Silver Key Senior Services Inc$468,35132%
Goodwill of Colorado$385,90790%
Cheyenne Village$369,16191%
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region$321,58690%
The Christian Home For Children Inc$321,586913%
Pikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care Inc$321,58690%
St Labre Indian School$321,5869n/a
Colorado Boys Ranch Foundation$321,586922%
St Francis Mission$132,56891%
Dakota Indian Foundation Inc$132,11193%
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Silver Key Senior Services Inc$468,35132%
Goodwill of Colorado$385,90790%
Cheyenne Village$369,16191%
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region$321,58690%
The Christian Home For Children Inc$321,586913%
Pikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care Inc$321,58690%
St Labre Indian School$321,5869n/a
Colorado Boys Ranch Foundation$321,586922%
St Francis Mission$132,56891%
Dakota Indian Foundation Inc$132,11193%
Red Cloud Indian School$128,6379n/a
Make-A-Wish Foundation of Colorado$128,63790%
Southwest Indian Foundation$128,6379n/a
Cheyenne Mountain Zoological Society$71,72490%
Colorado Springs Christian Schools$66,28290%
Sister of Mary Boystown and Girlstown Inc$60,84290%
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee$47,84770%
Westside Global Methodist Church$23,4173n/a
United States Olympic and Paralympic Foundation$14,50420%
Guideposts Foundation Inc$8,6071n/a
South-East Asian Relief Inc$1,73711%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.6M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilver Key Senior Services Inc: $468,351 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGoodwill of Colorado: $385,907 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCheyenne Village: $369,161 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHumane Society of the Pikes Peak Region: $321,586 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $321,586 over 9y, 13% of budgetPikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care Inc: $321,586 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Boys Ranch Foundation: $321,586 over 9y, 22% of budgetSt Francis Mission: $132,568 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetDakota Indian Foundation Inc: $132,111 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Colorado: $128,637 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCheyenne Mountain Zoological Society: $71,724 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Springs Christian Schools: $66,282 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSister of Mary Boystown and Girlstown Inc: $60,842 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Committee: $47,847 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Foundation: $14,504 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth-East Asian Relief Inc: $1,737 over 1y, 1.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust

How much does Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust give?
Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust reported 26 grants totaling $864,674 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 26 and 27 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (30%), Health (18%), Education (8%).
Who are Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Silver Key Senior Services Inc ($468k), Goodwill of Colorado ($386k), Cheyenne Village ($369k).
Does Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 4% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include El Pomar Foundation, Pikes Peak Community Foundation, Colorado Gives Foundation.
Where is Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust based?
Jacqueline G Archer Charitable Trust is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jacqueline G Archer’s filings →

More from the funding graph