Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jack D & Fredda S Sparks Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$395kHousing & Shelter$130kCommunity Improvement$80kEmployment$20kEnvironment$20kCivil Rights$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$187k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTHER OF LIGHT CENTER$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METRO WASH DC$15,000
MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER$15,000
VALLEY MISSION$10,000
PRECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Whitman-Walker Clinic: $10k → 14%PRECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $5k → 15%Mountain Resource Center: $15k → 7%VALLEY MISSION: $20k → 8%MOTHER OF LIGHT CENTER: $20k → 9%WHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH: $10k → 14%Northwest Abortion Access Fund: $5k → 15%MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 7%VALLEY MISSION: $20k → 8%MOTHER OF LIGHT CENTER: $20k → 9%DC Central Kitchen: $10k → 14%NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $5k → 15%Valley Mission Valley Mission: $20k → 8%MOTHER OF LIGHT CENTER: $10k → 9%DC CENTRAL KITCHEN: $10k → 14%NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $5k → 15%Valley Mission: $20k → 8%Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC: $50k → 14%Valley Mission Valley Mission: $10k → 8%Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC: $45k → 14%Valley Mission: $10k → 8%Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC: $40k → 14%VALLEY MISSION: $10k → 8%Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC: $40k → 14%Valley Mission Valley Mission: $10k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METRO WASH DC: $40k → 14%VALLEY MISSION: $10k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METRO WASH DC: $40k → 14%Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan: $40k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METRO WASH DC: $30k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METRO WASH DC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 7 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$530k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+58%

Still filing today

86%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VALLEY MISSION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +118%
  • MO
    Mother of Light Center
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +69%
  • MR
    MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • PP
    Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • DA
    DC Abortion Fund DC Abortion Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doula for the People

Doula For The People is working to promote reproductive justice and improve maternal morbidity rates by increasing assess to no cost doula services, perinatal wellness resources, and nutritional support.

Health
2
Abortion Access Fund Incorporated

To facilitate with women who need help financially to help pay for their abortion, whether abortion is needed for emotional, maternal or fetal health. To help medical facilities who perform abortions open and stay open.

Health
3
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
4
New River Abortion Access Fund

New river abortion access fund builds power and provides direct financial and practical support to southwest virginians and appalachians seeking abortion care. we dedicated to ensuring that all people have the autonomy and resources to…

Civil Rights
5
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
6
Feminist Women's Health Center

To achieve reproductive freedom, feminist women's health center - cedar river clinics provides abortion and reproductive health services and information, so women may determine their own destiny. we are a social change organization that…

—
7
Richmond Reproductive Freedom Project

The richmond reproductive freedom project (rrfp) seeks to further reproductive justice by providing practical and financial support for abortion services in virginia and surrounding communities. rrfp strives to be a resource to the…

—
8
Carolina Abortion Fund

The Carolina Abortion Fund supports individuals who have decided to have an abortion by providing financial, logistical, and emotional support.

Health
9
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
10
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
11
West Alabama Womens Center Inc

Free and sliding scale reproductive, maternal and sexual health clinic providing stigma-free, patient-centered care regardless of insurance, income, or documentation status. See Schedule O for full mission statement.

Health
12
Abortion Fund of Maryland Inc

Abortion fund of maryland (afm) provides financial assistance to people who live in or travel to maryland for abortion care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Ridge Abortion Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Preeclampsia Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC: $260,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of Metro Wash DCPlanned Parenthood of Metropolitan: $40,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of MetropolitanPlanned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC Planned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC: $40,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of Metro Wash DC Planned Parenthood of Metro W…THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherVALLEY MISSION INC: $130,000 · Housing & ShelterVALLEY MISSION INCMother of Light Center: $50,000 · Community ImprovementMother of Lig…MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN RESO…PREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthWHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC: $10,000 · HealthBLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC: $5,000 · HealthDC ABORTION FUND: $20,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $20,000 · Environment
Other$380,000Housing & Shelter$130,000Community Improvement$80,000Health$25,000Human Services$20,000Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY MISSION INC: $130,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetMother of Light Center: $50,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDC ABORTION FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VALLEY MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mother of Light Center ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DC ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds PREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack D & Fredda S Sparks Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack D & Fredda S Sparks Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Preeclampsia Foundation Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack D & Fredda S Sparks’ filings →

More from the funding graph