Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jack & Marci Williams Endowment for Wednesday's Child Inc

THE ORGANIZATION IS ENGAGED IN THE PRACTICE AND/OR PURSUIT OF FINDING AND/OR PLACING SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN, ADOPTIVE CHILDREN OR OTHER CHILDREN LOOKING FOR HOMES IN PERMANENT HOMES.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.7MHealth$256kEducation$245kYouth Development$120kCivil Rights$74kCrime & Legal$24k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANN'S HOME$60,000
ITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC$40,000
GEORGE H AND IRENE L WALKER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC$40,000
SPAULDING YOUTH CENTER FOUNDATION INC$40,000
MASSACHUSETTS ADOPTION RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC$40,000
BAY STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC (DIANNE DEVANNA CENTER)$8,000
BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC$8,000
BOSTON CASA INC$8,000
CASA PROJECT INC$8,000
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $25k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $8k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $8k → 8%BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$2.5M
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+22%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ST ANN'S HOME INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +60%
  • SA
    SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $375k · revenue +124%
  • WI
    WALKER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $365k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
2
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
3
Maine Behavioral Health Organization

The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…

Health
4
Bay Cove Human Services Inc

Bay cove human services' mission is to partner with people to overcome challenges and realize personal potential. bay cove pursues this mission by providing individualized and compassionate services to people facing the challenges…

—
5
Northeast Arc Inc

Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.

—
6
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
7
Caspar Inc

Caspar's mission is to provide community-based services to those affected by substance use disorders. caspar offers a comprehensive array of outreach, shelter, stabilization, residential aftercare, and prevention services to meet the needs…

Health
8
Brockton Area Arc Inc

Brockton area arc inc will work in partnership with and for the community to provide advocacy, information and direct services that offer new opportunities and choice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and…

Human Services
9
Cutchins Programs for Children & Families Inc

To help children and families transform significant emotional distress into increased resilience, hope and quality of life. to support the healing and learning process with innovation and integrity, and to serve as a model for best and…

Health
10
Melmark New England Inc

Melmark new england, is a multi state human services provider with premier private special education schools, professional development, training, and research centers. melmark new england is committed to enhancing the lives of individuals…

Education
11
North Suffolk Community Services Inc

North suffolk community services supports individuals and families across the lifespan in their pursuit of independence and stability by providing a comprehensive array of treatment and recovery services. our approach is to intervene as…

—
12
The May Institute Inc

May institute proudly serves individuals across the lifespan with autism, developmental disabilities, intellectual disabilities, neurological disorders, and behavior disorders to promote independence, choice, dignity, and respect. see…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Ann's Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Homefront Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANN'S HOME INC: $700,000 · OtherST ANN'S HOME INCMassachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc: $360,000 · OtherMassachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange IncBay State Community Services Inc: $40,000 · Other+2 more: $24,500 · OtherSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $375,000 · HealthSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVIC…ITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $365,000 · HealthITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INCWALKER INC: $365,000 · EducationWALKER INCBOSTON CASA INC: $74,000 · Civil RightsCASA PROJECT INC: $74,000 · Civil RightsBROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $89,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,124,500Health$740,000Education$365,000Civil Rights$148,000Human Services$89,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST ANN'S HOME INC: $700,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $375,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWALKER INC: $365,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $365,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMassachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc: $360,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetBROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $89,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CASA INC: $74,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCASA PROJECT INC: $74,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetBay State Community Services Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST ANN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds WALKER INC ↗
  • Who funds ITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Bay State Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity FundMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack & Marci Williams Endowment for Wednesday's Child Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack & Marci Williams Endowment for Wednesday's Child Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Bay State Community Services Inc: 76% of income from government
  • St Ann's Home Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Italian Home for Children Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Walker Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Boston Casa Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Brockton Area Multi-Services Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack & Marci Williams Endowment for Wednesday's Child’s filings →

More from the funding graph