Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc

To address issues affecting african american children and families by investing in programs and services that create a strong foundation for children to thrive long-term.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.5MYouth Development$1.1MHuman Services$763kHealth$585kHousing & Shelter$150kCommunity Improvement$64kArts & Culture$45kEmployment$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 43 grants below total $959,914 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,123,611 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $163,697 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $415k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $526k
$10,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kodjoe Family Foundation$150,000
JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA INC$109,500
UNCF$66,667
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CHICAGO STATE FOUNDATION$50,000
FLORIDA A&M$50,000
JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA INC$32,147
Morgan State University$30,863
NCNW$25,000
Southern University$20,849
WILEY UNIVERSITY$14,848
WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY$11,559
BALTIMORE ALLIANCE FOR CAREER$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THREE RIVERS YOUTH: $10k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATIO: $10k → 11%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB NEWBURGH INC: $5k → 14%CARES MOVEMENT: $25k → 17%FLITE CENTER: $10k → 13%CALEB'S KIDS: $11k → 21%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%COBURN PLACE SAFE HAVEN: $10k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $10k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%SISTER TO SISTER INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 9%FLITE CENTER: $5k → 13%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES INC: $10k → 15%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 21%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $8k → 15%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $8k → 8%CALEBS KIDS: $10k → 21%CALUMET CENTER OF METROPOLITAN FAMI: $10k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%METROPOLITICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%CALUMET CENTER OF METROPOLITAN: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $10k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'SVILLAGES ILLINOIS: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 31% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 45 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
107

Total granted

$3.1M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+23%

Still filing today

80%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $592k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $614k · revenue +99%
  • JJ
    JACK & JILL OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $365k · revenue +155%
  • CS
    Chicago State Foundation
    5× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALE
    one grant, 2021 · $172k
  • AS
    ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $129k
  • UD
    UNIVERSITY DISTRICT OF COLUMB
    one grant, 2024 · $61k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Link Unlimited Scholars

To connect Black students with resources and opportunities that strengthen the necessary skills to succeed as they advance to, through, and beyond college.

Education
2
Collegespring Inc

In partnership with educators, CollegeSpring helps students impacted by poverty demonstrate their full potential on college and career readiness assessments that unlock better opportunities after high school. Our vision is that every…

Education
3
Building Bridges Education

Building Bridges Education (BBE) is a non-profit organization at the forefront of creating transformative, high-impact programming. BBE is committed to equity-driven initiatives that empower students to embark on journeys of…

Education
4
Student U

Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.

Education
5
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
6
College Aim Inc

To provide expert coaching from ninth grade through college graduation, and work to dismantle systemic racial and economic barriers, so that greater atlanta students are able to achieve their ambitions.

Education
7
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
10
Onegoal

Onegoal (the organization") is a nonprofit organization incorporated on june 13, 2003 to provide underserved students with the resources, support, and network to earn a postsecondary degree.

Youth Development
11
Network for Young Adult Success

Our mission is to empower young adults to realize their professional aspirations by supporting their successful degree attainment and career preparation.

Education
12
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Moms Inc and the most unlike its peers is Common Table Health Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesCancer Support ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Elementary Literacy TutoringChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesYouth Development ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/150
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,415

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 182 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/129
Grantees still filing
83/129
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA INC — $985,166 · OtherJACK AND JILL OF AMERICA INCJACK & JILL OF AMERICA INC — $364,556 · OtherJACK & JILL OF AMERICA INCSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALE — $171,800 · OtherSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALEALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY — $129,024 · Other+77 more — $1,257,791 · Other+77 moreUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $613,616 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCChicago State Foundation — $90,000 · EducationChicago State FoundationLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $71,465 · EducationTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $64,987 · Education+39 more — $694,757 · Education+39 moreCalebs Kids — $40,165 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family Services — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION — $38,500 · Human ServicesNational Cares Mentoring Movement Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesSISTER TO SISTER INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $20,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY — $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES — $18,000 · Human ServicesFLORIDA INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 · Human Services+10 more — $88,000 · Human ServicesThe Blue Heart Foundation — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOR INC — $17,400 · Youth DevelopmentSTREETCODE ACADEMY — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLACK PILOTS OF AMERICA INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG WOMEN ON THE MOVE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLASS MATTERS INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE STEM CONNECTION — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJOIN HANDS ESL — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTER FOR THE INNOVATIVE TRAINING OF YOUTH INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIVE HEALTHY & THRIVE YOUTH FDN — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROWN GIRLS CODE — $9,957 · Youth DevelopmentENVISION CHILDREN — $9,200 · Youth DevelopmentGASKINS FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUILDING BLOCKS 2 SUCCESS INC — $8,000 · Youth Development+3 more — $15,280 · Youth DevelopmentKodjoe Family Foundation — $150,000 · HealthMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $20,000 · HealthThe Defensive Line Inc — $10,000 · HealthPea Pod Nutrition and Lactation — $10,000 · HealthT Leroy Jefferson Medical Society Inc — $10,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY — $9,980 · HealthSickle Cell Foundation Of Palm Beach County Inc — $9,720 · HealthTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyGreene Scholars — $20,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGREYSTON FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyNAMI GREATER HOUSTON — $10,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $18,000 · Housing & ShelterGreater Charlotte Apartment Association Education Foundation — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDreamKey Partners Inc — $9,998 · Housing & ShelterDayspring Center Inc — $7,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,908,337Education$1,534,825Human Services$322,665Youth Development$222,837Health$219,700Philanthropy$70,000Housing & Shelter$64,998

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $613,616 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJACK & JILL OF AMERICA INC — $364,556 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetChicago State Foundation — $90,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $71,465 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $64,987 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPhilander Smith College — $50,365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI Chicago — $45,681 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $44,422 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalebs Kids — $40,165 over 4y, 27% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION — $38,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHAW UNIVERSITY — $35,109 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER AUGUSTA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARCHAEOLOGY IN THE COMMUNITY — $30,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDILLARD UNIVERSITY — $29,458 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $29,107 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $29,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBENEDICT COLLEGE — $29,077 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVANNAH STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC AND SUBSIDIARIES — $29,062 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY — $28,888 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $27,596 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Cares Mentoring Movement Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Ingenuity Project Inc — $22,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON TABLE HEALTH ALLIANCE — $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSTARS MATH AND ENGLISH ACADEMY — $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetWEB DUBOIS SCHOLARS INSTITUTE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Survivors of Torture — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Blue Heart Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetGreene Scholars — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSISTER TO SISTER INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $18,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLawrence Hall — $18,225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY — $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES — $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $17,829 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLaw and Leadership Institute LLC — $17,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCOR INC — $17,400 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTREETCODE ACADEMY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLORIDA INDEPENDENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tom Joyner Foundation IncTX25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tom Joyner Foundation Inc · Strada Education Foundation Inc · National Basketball Association Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Educational Credit Management Corporation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · United Negro College Fund Inc · AT&T Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • Elevate Oregon28% of income from government
  • Urban League of Essex County20% of income from government
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 182 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph