How much did TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC reported 17 grants totaling $399,439 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC based?

TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC is based in TX.

TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC

Administers educational & scholarship programs for students enrolled in hbcus (historically black colleges and universities).

$399k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$57k

Largest

01What you fund

0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Education$2.9MRecreation & Sports$75kArts & Culture$25kOther$1.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

lawsonvolunteerraisingmanagementelizabethresultgala

2019

fullrequireda&mpowervaluesenhancementprepare

2020

a&mmorehousemenpursuitwillingunderstanding appreciationexcellence

2021

healthsolicit receivehigher learningemphasizes academicscheduleeligiblespiritual values

2022

amateur sportssports athleticathletic tournamentstournaments heldheld aroundaround greatergreater baltimore

2023

morehousemenpursuitwillingunderstanding appreciationskillsexcellence

2024

preparationamateur sportssports athleticathletic tournamentstournaments heldheld aroundaround greater

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $33k
$10k–50k9 grants · $179k
$50k–250k3 grants · $165k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

HOWARD UNIVERSITY$56,952
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY$56,500
ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY$51,500
NATL MUSEUM OF AFAMCULTURE$25,000
BALTIMORE SPORTS TOURDEVCOUNCIL$25,000
NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY$23,590
BENNETT COLLEGE$20,000
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$20,000
JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY$15,000
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY OF PA$15,000
BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY$10,500
DILLARD UNIVERSITY$8,200
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$7,240
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY$6,352

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 12%. 74% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.8M · 45 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.8M

$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+34%

Still filing today

98%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HU
HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY
4× · 2018–2021 · $453k · revenue +32%
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
7× · 2018–2024 · $371k · revenue +30%
TC
TOUGALOO COLLEGE
4× · 2018–2021 · $205k · revenue +5%

Funded once

GS
GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITYgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +267%
LS
LAWSON STATE
one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue -17%
AS
ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2021 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Carolina University

A Christ-centered university committed to exceptional teaching, scholarly research, creative innovation, and professional collaboration.

Education

Franklin University

Franklin University is a student-centered, nonprofit, independent institution providing high quality, relevant education to enable the broadest possible community of learners to achieve their goals and enrich the world.

—

Union Institute & University

Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…

—

Columbus State University

The Columbus State University Foundation supports educational excellence and the expansion of educational opportunities at Columbus State University. The Foundation attracts, receives, invests, manages, and expends gifts and other…

Education

Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—

Lincoln University

To provide traditional educational programs in diverse fields of study, delivered by experienced educators, and leading to outstanding employment opportunities for American and international students

—

Tuskegee University

To provide quality post secondary educational opportunities and contribute to the betterment of society through research and development

Education

Alfred University

The mission of Alfred University is to provide excellent quality and enduring value through academic and co-curricular programming that is both intellectually challenging and practically relevant. We are culturally diverse and…

Education

Shorter University

Shorter University is a private Christian non-profit comprehensive liberal arts institution.

Education

Waynesburg University

Provide higher education to students in undergraduate and graduate programs

Education

American Baptist Theological Seminary

The mission of American Baptist College, a Historically Black College with a liberal arts emphasis, is to educate, graduate, and prepare diverse students for Christian leadership, service, and social justice in the world.

Education

Hardin-Simmons University

To be a community providing excellence in education enlightened by Christian faith and values.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Valley State University Founda and the most unlike its peers is Morehouse College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/92

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,473

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

85 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

84/85

Grantees still filing

65/85

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$2,881,390Other$1,148,588Recreation & Sports$75,200Arts & Culture$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Negro College Fund IncDC74.4× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Negro College Fund Inc · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Thurgood Marshall College Fund · Educational Credit · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Dr Maya Angelou Foundation · Student Freedom Initiative Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Texas Guaranteed Student Loan · Chapman Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LAWSON STATE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~28 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 636112129 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LAWSON STATE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 28 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Tom Joyner Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tom Joyner Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

85 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Tom Joyner Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

TOM JOYNER FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

85 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Tom Joyner Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph