Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J L Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$45kHealth$33kYouth Development$17kPhilanthropy$6kReligion$5kInternational$4kEnvironment$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$636k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$5,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$5,000
SCHOOLPOWER LAGUNA BEACH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,880
GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE$1,500
CEDARS SINAI$1,000
CEDARS SINAI$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TAHOE FUND: $1k → 6%ONEOC: $500 → 10%TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $1k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CHARITY BUZZ: $4k → 17%WAY OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $5k → 14%GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE: $6k → 9%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3k → 21%OUSELESSEBOUGOU ALLIANCE: $1k → 8%CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%SCHOOLPOWER LAGUNA BEACH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%AMALFI JETS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%CEDARS SINAI: $1k → 14%GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CEDARS SINAI: $1k → 14%HOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%CEDARS-SINAI: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$61k · 5 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$61k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +573%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • CW
    CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • HL
    HOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +19%
  • WO
    WAY OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CB
    CHARITY BUZZ
    one grant, 2020 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
University of Redlands

We welcome, educate, and empower a diverse community of learners for lives of meaning, impact, and joy.

Education
8
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
9
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
10
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
11
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
12
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC — $17,000 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INCMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $12,500 · HealthMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDRE…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $3,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOINSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherINSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATIONWAY OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP — $5,000 · OtherWAY OF LIFE FELLOWSHIPCHARITY BUZZ — $3,575 · OtherCHARITY BUZZSCHOOLPOWER LAGUNA BEACH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,880 · OtherSCHOOLPOWER LAGUNA BEACH EDUCAT…RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $27,300 · PhilanthropyRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUN…The Amalfi Jets Charitable Foundation — $2,545 · PhilanthropyThe Amalfi Jets Charitable Fou…+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyHOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $1,200 · EnvironmentTAHOE FUND — $1,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · EnvironmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $3,000 · ReligionOUELESSEBOUGOU ALLIANCE — $1,000 · International
Health$32,500Other$31,455Philanthropy$30,345Youth Development$7,000Education$5,000Environment$3,200Religion$3,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $27,300 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Amalfi Jets Charitable Foundation — $2,545 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUELESSEBOUGOU ALLIANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONEOC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J L Taylor Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph