Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Homer Butler Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$179k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$541kHealth$300kHuman Services$256kReligion$147kPublic Safety & Disaster$58kEducation$21kEnvironment$8kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
$6,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMBRACE A VILLAGE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
DALIT SOLIDARITY$20,000
DAMIEN HOUSE$15,000
SEWING HOPE FOUNDATION$15,000
WELLS 4 WELLNESS$10,000
IMPACT INITIATIVES INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
MOUNTAIN OF HOPE$6,000
SOLIDARITY BRIDGE$5,000
CONCERN AMERICA$5,000
EMPOWERMENT WORKS$5,000
ST DOMINIC'S FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
MED WISH$5,000
MARYKNOLL LAY MISSIONERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMBRACE A VILLAGE: $31k → 11%EMBRACE A VILLAGE: $30k → 11%EMBRACE A VILLAGE: $30k → 11%EMBRACE A VILLAGE: $30k → 11%EMBRACE A VILLAGE: $30k → 11%EMBRACE A VILLAGE: $19k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 53% of J Homer Butler Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 18% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 5%.

J Homer Butler Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 72% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$988k · 30 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
43

Total granted

$988k
$302k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+15%

Still filing today

50%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthReligionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EMBRACE A VILLAGE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $170k · revenue +251%
  • MF
    MEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +15%
  • DH
    DAMIEN HOUSE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $62k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TC
    TEXAS CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTERS
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • UM
    USA MIDWEST PROVINCE JESUITS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • MS
    MISSIONARY SISTERS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Twin Missions International

Mission work

Health
2
Shattering Darkness Inc

To reach the unreached people groups of west africa primarily in burking faso and ghana-sharing the gospel message of jesus christ. the organization also provides basic medical care such as vitamins for children and treatment for malaria…

Religion
3
Mission Vision Inc

Mission vision has both an international focus and community based focus in western pennsylvania. on an international scale, it facilitates training of health care professionals and missionaries, promotes wellness and education, and…

Health
4
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
5
New Vision Ministries Inc

To provide optical medication and services for the poor in foreign countries

Health
6
Hope International

Provide free medical assistance to poor people in 3rd world countries

International
7
Kingdom Investment International Inc

Kingdom Investment works among the poor and oppressed to bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God that results in holistic transformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Religion
8
Christian Ministries International
—
9
International Health & Development Network Inc

To develope a ministry using the earthly work of Jesus Christ as a model and thereby seek the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being of individuals in communities, esecially in developing countries by providing humanitarian…

Philanthropy
10
The Hands of Christ

To provide for the physcial needs of the poor in honduras by providing free medical care.

Health
11
Marion Medical Mission

Provide medical and other services to underdeveloped countries, primarily in africa, under the auspices of various christian missionary organizations. the major activity is the construction of wells for drinking water in remote african…

International
12
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Austin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA: $101,000 · OtherJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USAJESUIT USA CENTRAL SOUTHERN PROVINC: $42,500 · OtherJESUIT USA CENTRAL SOUTHERN PROVINCIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $25,000 · OtherELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $25,000 · OtherBERNARDINE SISTER OF THE THIRD: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · Other+44 more: $369,000 · Other+44 moreMEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC: $63,000 · InternationalMEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INCDAMIEN HOUSE INC: $61,739 · InternationalDAMIEN HOUSE INCCONCERN AMERICA: $35,000 · InternationalCONCERN AMERICADALIT SOLIDARITY: $35,000 · InternationalDALIT SOLIDARITYCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $32,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD I…FRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD: $26,000 · InternationalFRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLDVISION FOR THE POOR: $25,000 · InternationalVISION FOR THE POORSEWING HOPE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · International+11 more: $78,000 · International+11 moreEMBRACE A VILLAGE: $170,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE A VILL…SOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $43,000 · HealthMEDWISH MEDWORKS: $20,000 · HealthFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $15,000 · HealthMISSION FUEL INC: $22,000 · ReligionVISIONS MADE VIABLE: $11,300 · ReligionSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $5,000 · ReligionST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $21,150 · Education
Other$648,000International$385,739Human Services$170,000Health$78,000Religion$38,300Education$21,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMBRACE A VILLAGE: $170,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetMEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC: $63,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDAMIEN HOUSE INC: $61,739 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $43,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCONCERN AMERICA: $35,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetDALIT SOLIDARITY: $35,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISION FOR THE POOR: $25,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMISSION FUEL INC: $22,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $21,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDWISH MEDWORKS: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEWING HOPE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAustin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles: $12,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVISIONS MADE VIABLE: $11,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWELLS 4 WELLNESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImpact Initiatives Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetPROVIDENCE MOUNT ST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MOUNTAIN OF HOPE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT DOMINIC'S FAMILY SERVICES (FORMERLY SAINT DOMINIC'S HOME): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowerment Works Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD AID: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF ST EGIDIO USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN BRIGADES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ACTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMBRACE A VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds MEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DAMIEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DALIT SOLIDARITY ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VISION FOR THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FUEL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEDWISH MEDWORKS ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SEWING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles ↗
  • Who funds VISIONS MADE VIABLE ↗
  • Who funds WELLS 4 WELLNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Impact Initiatives Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE MOUNT ST VINCENT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities IncDE13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Homer Butler Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Homer Butler Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J Homer Butler Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to J Homer Butler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J Homer Butler’s filings →

More from the funding graph