Skip to content

· Private foundation

J & J Hadfield Foundation Hadfield

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.3MInternational$253kPhilanthropy$81kHealth$81kHousing & Shelter$48kEducation$36kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $117k
$1,170
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST$117,340
A CHILDS HOPE FOUNDATION$5,000
MERCURY ONE INC$3,500
THE EXODUS ROAD INC$2,432
CUMORAH ACADEMY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,170
PRE BORN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NO KID HUNGRY$1,000
BOOK OF MORMON OF CENTRAL$768
RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRE BORN: $5k → 16%A CHILDS HOPE FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%PRE BORN: $1k → 16%A CHILDS HOPE FOUNDATION: $90k → 8%A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $48k → 8%A CHILDS HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%TABITHA'S WAY: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES: $100 → 8%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $500 → 8%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $106 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CA
UT
CO
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$390k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$266k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+23%

Still filing today

70%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $243k · revenue +243%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +93%
  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $6k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • LP
    LDS PHILANTHROPIES
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $71k
  • MH
    MOBILE HOUSING OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2018 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
3
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
6
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
7
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
8
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
9
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
10
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
11
Union Rescue Mission

Union rescue mission embraces people with the compassion of christ. we assist people experiencing homelessness by providing a comprehensive array of emergency and long-term services to our guests, including: food, shelter, clothing,…

Human Services
12
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Book of Mormon Central. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $1,026,429 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSLDS CHURCH: $180,288 · OtherLDS CHURCHCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST: $117,340 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTLDS PHILANTHROPIES: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $70,986 · Other+14 more: $129,159 · Other+14 moreA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $243,000 · Human ServicesA CHILD'S HOPE …+4 more: $8,706 · Human ServicesMercury One Inc: $4,500 · InternationalTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $2,432 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $1,000 · InternationalOUR RESCUE: $6,100 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationCUMORAH ACADEMY: $1,500 · EducationGIVE LIVELY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL: $768 · Religion
Other$1,604,202Human Services$251,706International$9,932Arts & Culture$6,100Education$5,500Philanthropy$1,000Religion$768

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $243,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $12,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $6,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $2,432 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTABITHA'S WAY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUMORAH ACADEMY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE LIVELY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL: $768 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $606 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Action Services and Food Bank: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EXODUS ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TABITHA'S WAY ↗
  • Who funds CUMORAH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GIVE LIVELY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds BOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Action Services and Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · University Impact · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J & J Hadfield Foundation Hadfield funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J & J Hadfield Foundation Hadfield. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J & J Hadfield Foundation Hadfield’s filings →

    More from the funding graph