Skip to content
ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$428kHousing & Shelter$421kHuman Services$186kPublic Safety & Disaster$106kFood & Nutrition$67kAnimals$47kInternational$45kEducation$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k60 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$1,500
Median grant
18
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMI NATIONAL$75,000
WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$5,250
K9S FOR WARRIORS INC$4,510
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$4,395
LINES FOR LIFE$2,500
SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT$2,500
STEPHEN BENITO JACOBO FOUNDATION$2,500
TOGETHER WE RISE CORPORATION$2,500
FEEDING AMERICA$2,435
SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$2,250
BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC$2,250
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$2,019
ENCIRCLE FAMILIES$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$1,500
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITTLE WISHES: $1k → 8%DESARROLLO FAMILIAR: $2k → 9%UNITED ACROSS BORDERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%YOUTH VIOLENCE PREVENTION COUNCIL OF SHASTA COUNTY: $750 → 14%PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $750 → 8%HAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER INC: $2k → 15%CONSTRUCTION ANGELS INC: $3k → 13%ROSIES RANCH: $1k → 3%ARC THRIFT STORES: $3k → 7%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $750 → 7%THE ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $1k → 11%A SENSE OF HOME: $3k → 14%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%HEAVEN SOUTH INC: $2k → 14%SKOOKUM KIDS: $2k → 12%HEARING LOSS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 8%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%UNITED FOOD BANK AND SERVICES OF PLANT CITY INC: $3k → 13%JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND INC: $2k → 9%THERE WITH CARE: $750 → 12%RYAN HOUSE: $4k → 11%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%FALLEN FIRE FIGHTER RELIEF FUND: $2k → 10%VIEN TRUONG SINH HOC DASIRA NARADA: $1k → 10%THE ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $1k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILIES: $2k → 11%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $3k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 11%SHES THE FIRST INC: $1k → 17%DRUG AWARENESS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2k → 17%ARIZONAS CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 11%WEECYCLE: $1k → 12%NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 43 repeat orgs$382k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
248

Total granted

$1.0M
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+19%

Still filing today

70%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NAMI National
    4× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +211%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $104k · revenue +32%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -18%
  • RH
    RYAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -39%
  • SI
    SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
7
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
8
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
9
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
10
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
12
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Eden Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

283 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 283 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
278/283
Grantees still filing
180/283
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $400,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $103,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - MILE HIGH CHAPTER: $49,597 · OtherAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - MILE HIGH CHAPTERAMERICAN RED CROSS - MILE HIGH CHAPTER: $44,535 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - MILE HIGH CHAPTER+91 more: $184,536 · Other+91 moreNAMI National: $225,000 · HealthNAMI NationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,695 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH …+40 more: $81,500 · Health+40 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $11,702 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,672 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSE: $4,000 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesUNITED FOOD BANK & SERVICES OF PLANT CITY INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCONSTRUCTION ANGELS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesARC THRIFT STORES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesA SENSE OF HOME: $2,500 · Human Services+16 more: $23,750 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $39,935 · Food & NutritionNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $3,750 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $4,250 · Food & NutritionDIRECT RELIEF: $26,250 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $3,250 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $1,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,500 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,500 · InternationalCARRY THE FUTURE: $1,500 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $1,500 · InternationalHELP THE HELPLESS: $1,500 · InternationalCHILDREN OF VIETNAM: $1,500 · InternationalK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $7,010 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,250 · AnimalsSan Antonio Pets Alive Inc: $2,250 · AnimalsANGEL CITY PIT BULLS: $1,500 · AnimalsMountain Cats TNR Inc: $1,500 · AnimalsAZ HUSKY RESCUE: $1,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF CATS INC: $1,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $1,500 · AnimalsHidden Harbor Marine Environmental Project Inc: $1,500 · AnimalsYAKIMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 · AnimalsPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $1,500 · AnimalsLIFELINE PET RESCUE: $1,500 · AnimalsPETSMART CHARITIES INC: $1,500 · AnimalsProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS: $1,500 · AnimalsDenver Dachshunds Rescue and Transport: $1,500 · AnimalsANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS: $1,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,462 · AnimalsREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $3,750 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterLODI HOUSE: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterCASA YOUTH SHELTER: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterNEW BEGINNINGS OF TAMPA INC: $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$782,168Health$331,195Human Services$62,124Food & Nutrition$50,435International$40,000Animals$32,472Housing & Shelter$20,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAMI National: $225,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $103,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $39,935 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $26,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,695 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $11,702 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $7,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,672 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,786 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTeam River Runner Incorporated: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAMA BEARS FIGHTING CHILDHOOD CANCER: $5,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOODHOUND MAN-TRACKERS INC: $4,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $3,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEssentially Everly Inc: $2,750 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNAMI SAN DIEGO: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED FOOD BANK & SERVICES OF PLANT CITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF WASHINGTON: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NEUROBLASTOMA CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONSTRUCTION ANGELS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLines for Life: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARC THRIFT STORES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA SENSE OF HOME: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Sempra FoundationAmerican Express Foun…Pledgeling FoundationThe Denver FoundationAmerica's CharitiesGive Lively Foundatio…Shell USA Company Fou…Lamb Weston Charitabl…The Albertsons Compan…Libertygives Foundati…Lumen Clarke M Willia…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Sempra Foundation · American Express Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation · The Denver Foundation · America's Charities · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Libertygives Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Lines for Life: 70% of income from government
  • New Beginnings of Tampa Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Team River Runner Incorporated: 19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation?

Find your warmest path to ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 337 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home