Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irpan & Xia Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2026still arriving
60
Grants FY2026still arriving
18
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2026.

Religion$6kArts & Culture$4kHuman Services$4kHealth$3kEducation$3kInternational$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$780Food & Nutrition$725Other$0
02FY2026 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$70
Median grant
18
States reached
$430k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,240
Individual grant recipient$380
St Joseph$260
Stanford$190
Words On Fires$160
St Athanasius$154
Second Harvest Food Bank$135
Individual grant recipient$125
KQED$125
US Olympic$125
Individual grant recipient$110
Individual grant recipient$100
Palo Alto Medical Foundation$100
American Heart Association$90
St Patricks Seminary University$90
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $429) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Wounded Warriors Project: $70 → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $69 → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $50 → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $45 → 14%Avenidas: $20 → 8%Avenidas: $20 → 8%YMCA Silicon Valley: $25 → 8%Catholic Charity of Santa Clara County: $60 → 8%Catholic Charity of Santa Clara County: $50 → 8%Catholic Charity of Santa Clara County: $20 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
HI
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 73 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2026, 33 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
95

Total granted

$31k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+2%

Still filing today

30%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $880 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KI
    KQED INC
    2× · 2021–2026 · $3k · revenue +4%
  • SB
    SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2026 · $968 · revenue +44%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $340 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CM
    CCL ministry of the diocese of Oakland CFCS
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • O
    OLOP
    one grant, 2021 · $880
  • JC
    Jesuit Center
    one grant, 2023 · $320
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
5
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

Health
11
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Wellness Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
27/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $9,520 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,286 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCCL ministry of the diocese of Oakland CFCS: $2,070 · OtherCCL ministry of the diocese of Oakland CFCSIndividual grant recipient: $1,565 · Other+155 more: $16,652 · Other+155 moreKQED INC: $2,925 · Arts & CultureSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $968 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $361 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $245 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $240 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $235 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $164 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $140 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $120 · HealthNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100 · Health+2 more: $70 · HealthUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $360 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $340 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $140 · InternationalTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $100 · InternationalFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $78 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $50 · International+1 more: $20 · InternationalTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $550 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $35 · Education+2 more: $30 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $234 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $130 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50 · Human ServicesAVENIDAS: $40 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $25 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $250 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $42 · Public Benefit
Other$33,093Arts & Culture$2,925Health$2,643International$1,088Education$615Human Services$479Public Benefit$292

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKQED INC: $2,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $968 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $361 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $360 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $340 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $245 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $240 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $235 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $234 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $164 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC: $91 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSV HOME: $85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $80 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESPAN EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVENIDAS: $40 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irpan & Xia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irpan & Xia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 189 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irpan & Xia’s filings →

More from the funding graph