Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ira and Edgra Ringler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Environment$165kCrime & Legal$89kRecreation & Sports$44kArts & Culture$44kInternational$42kEducation$37kPhilanthropy$33kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
$8,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE CEELI INSTITUTE$10,500
ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE$10,000
ARTS EVERY DAY$10,000
WOMENS FOUNDATION OF BOSTON$9,000
TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND$9,000
ERIN LEVITAS FOUNDATION$9,000
SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL KEEPER$8,000
JEFFY'S FIELD FUND CO THE COMMUNITY FDN OF FREDERICK COUNTY$8,000
LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$8,000
CASA MARYLAND$6,500
PUBLIC MEDIA BRIDGE FUND$5,000
MINORITIES IN AQUACULTURE$4,500
GAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY$4,500
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $9k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $9k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $9k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Ira and Edgra Ringler Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Ira and Edgra Ringler Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$427k · 19 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$427k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-8%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCrime & LegalEducationInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +43%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $33k · revenue +123%
  • TL
    THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $32k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • FF
    FUND FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE EMERGENCY SCHOOL CLOSURE FUND- TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • MF
    MAUI FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +5%
  • BB
    BALTIMORE BAR FOUNDATION COURTING ART
    one grant, 2021 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
4
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
5
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
6
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
7
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
8
Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana

The mission of the coalition to restore coastal louisiana (crcl) is to unite people in action to achieve a thriving, sustainable louisiana coast for all.

Environment
9
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
International Conservation Caucus Network

To advance conservation governance through political will and to provide "on the ground" solutions to ensure sustained economic benefits while managing the earth's natural resource wealth for future generations.

Unclassified
12
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Channelkeeper Inc and the most unlike its peers is Santa Cruz Island Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEFFY'S FIELD FUND CO THE COMMUNITY FDN OF FREDERICK COUNTY — $34,500 · OtherJEFFY'S FIELD FUND CO THE COMMUNITY FDN…FUND FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE EMERGENCY SCHOOL CLOSURE FUND- TECHNOLOGY — $20,000 · OtherFUND FOR EDUCATION EXCELLENCE EMERGENCY…Individual grant recipient — $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAUI FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $12,000 · OtherMAUI FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INCJEFFERY HAYEK MEMORIAL FUND CO THE COMMUNITY FDN OF FREDERICK COUNTY — $9,000 · OtherWOMENS FOUNDATION OF BOSTON COVID RESPONSE FUND — $7,500 · OtherCASA INC — $6,500 · OtherBSO ORCHKIDS GENERAL FUND — $6,500 · OtherCOLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION — $6,500 · OtherBALTIMORE BAR FOUNDATION COURTING ART — $5,872 · OtherCHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAPEAKE MUSIC — $10,500 · OtherCHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAP…+6 more — $23,000 · Other+6 moreALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $39,500 · EnvironmentALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUESANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC — $33,935 · EnvironmentSANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER IN…THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $31,935 · EnvironmentTHE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBA…MINORITIES IN AQUACULTURE — $23,500 · EnvironmentMINORITIES IN AQUACULTUREGAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY — $8,500 · EnvironmentGAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCYFRIENDS OF CEELI INSTITUTE — $48,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…ERIN MICHELE LEVITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $29,500 · Crime & LegalERIN MICH…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER — $8,500 · Crime & LegalENVIRONME…PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JU…THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC — $41,870 · Human ServicesTHE TANZA…WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $33,000 · PhilanthropyARTS EVERY DAY INC — $21,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Education
Other$173,872Environment$137,370International$48,500Crime & Legal$43,000Human Services$41,870Philanthropy$33,000Education$26,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF CEELI INSTITUTE — $48,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC — $41,870 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $39,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC — $33,935 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $33,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $31,935 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetERIN MICHELE LEVITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $29,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMINORITIES IN AQUACULTURE — $23,500 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetARTS EVERY DAY INC — $21,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMAUI FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAPEAKE MUSIC — $10,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER — $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY — $8,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCASA INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PLACE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CEELI INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC
  • Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
  • Who funds ERIN MICHELE LEVITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MINORITIES IN AQUACULTURE
  • Who funds ARTS EVERY DAY INC
  • Who funds MAUI FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAPEAKE MUSIC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER
  • Who funds GAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CASA INC
  • Who funds COLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PAUL'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds SANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emmett FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emmett Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · The Osherenko-Young Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Marin Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ira and Edgra Ringler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Paul's Place Inc29% of income from government
  • Casa Inc8% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc5% of income from government
  • Arts Every Day Inc4% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Chamber Music Inc T/a Chesapeake Music2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ira and Edgra Ringler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ira and Edgra Ringler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph