Skip to content
Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault

To unite people and organizations to promote a society free from sexual violence and to meet the diverse needs of survivors.

$386k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$137k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$1.8MHuman Services$1.5MCivil Rights$1.0MEducation$167kHealth$128kPhilanthropy$12kYouth Development$8k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $231,052, the rows itemized in this filing. The $386,494 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $155,442 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $137k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$932k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST SA$137,453
JACOBSON LAWYERS GROUP PLLC$24,204
MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC$22,915
COURAGEOUS FIRE LLC$15,000
GRYPHON CONSULTING LLC$11,850
AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES$7,060
IOWA SAFE SCHOOLS$6,450
CHIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$6,120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICE: $80k → 5%DEAF IOWANS AGAINST ABUSE: $21k → 9%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES: $79k → 10%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $81k → 17%CRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER: $78k → 5%DEAF IOWANS AGAINST ABUSE: $20k → 9%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES: $67k → 10%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $78k → 17%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICE: $6k → 5%DEAF IOWANS AGAINST ABUSE: $6k → 9%LATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER: $34k → 10%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES: $17k → 10%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $73k → 17%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $39k → 17%LATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER: $15k → 10%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 17%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $218k → 10%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 17%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $188k → 10%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $174k → 10%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $136k → 10%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $124k → 10%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $74k → 10%MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN: $52k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 18 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$4.7M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+38%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $985k · revenue +75%
  • MA
    MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $965k · revenue +947% · 45% of their budget
  • RT
    RESPECT TOGETHER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $442k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • National Network to End Domestic Violence Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
2
Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

Human Services
3
Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault

The purpose of the illinois coalition against sexual assault is two-fold: to end sexual assault violence and to alleviate the suffering of sexual assault victims. to accomplish these goals, icasa advocates for public policy that prevents…

—
4
Family Crisis Centers Inc

Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.

Human Services
5
Center for Survivor Agency Andjustice

CSAJ is a national organization dedicated to enhancing advocacy for survivors of intimate partner violence. We develop and promote advocacy approaches that remove systemic barriers enhance organizational responses and improve professional…

Crime & Legal
6
Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault

The Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault is a statewide coalition driving transformative culture change to address sexual violence through advocacy, prevention, racial justice, and systems change. We envision a world free of sexual…

Crime & Legal
7
Crisis Center of the Plains

To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault

To unite people and organizations to promote a society free from sexual violence and to meet the diverse needs of survivors. the organization connects sexual assault agencies across the state and helps provide resources, tools, and…

—
9
Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Vision statement: icadv envisions a statewide community committed to exposing the root causes of domestic abuse and ensuring safety for families by supporting the voices of all survivors.mission statement: icadv builds networks of support…

Health
10
Advocacy Center of Winona

The advocacy center of winona's mission is to end domestic and sexual violence in winona county.

—
11
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
12
Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence

To engage all people in a movement to change the social and political systems that perpetuate violence against women. we do this through education, advocacy and quality services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amani Community Service; the most unlike its peers is North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc: $985,024 · OtherNorth Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assaul…State University of Iowa: $536,467 · OtherState University of IowaWASHINGTON COALITION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT P: $178,394 · OtherWASHINGTON COALITION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT P+9 more: $272,777 · Other+9 moreMONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY: $964,593 · Human ServicesMONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN S…AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICE: $297,639 · Human ServicesAMANI COMMUNITY SERVICECRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER: $164,658 · Human ServicesCRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTERCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $163,786 · Human ServicesCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC+2 more: $96,428 · Human Services+2 moreRESPECT TOGETHER: $441,914 · Crime & LegalRESPECT TOGETHERMINNESOTA INDIAN WOMEN'S SEXUAL ASSUALT COALITION: $316,781 · Crime & LegalMINNESOTA INDIAN …NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS-IOWA INC: $127,857 · HealthASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AN: $51,193 · HealthRiverview Center Inc: $167,267 · EducationIOWA SAFE SCHOOLS: $6,450 · EducationCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $12,000 · PhilanthropyNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $7,793 · Youth Development
Other$1,972,662Human Services$1,687,104Crime & Legal$758,695Health$179,050Education$173,717Philanthropy$12,000Youth Development$7,793

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorth Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc: $985,024 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetMONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY: $964,593 over 8y, 45% of budgetRESPECT TOGETHER: $441,914 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMINNESOTA INDIAN WOMEN'S SEXUAL ASSUALT COALITION: $316,781 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetAMANI COMMUNITY SERVICE: $297,639 over 6y, 14% of budgetWASHINGTON COALITION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT P: $178,394 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetRiverview Center Inc: $167,267 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER: $164,658 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $163,786 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS-IOWA INC: $127,857 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetNIAD CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $53,227 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AN: $51,193 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER: $49,280 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $49,009 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTHRIVE TOGETHER TODAY INC: $47,148 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetCATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL CONCERN INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $45,960 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $44,492 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $7,793 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA SAFE SCHOOLS: $6,450 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Grea…Iowa Coalition Agains…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA20.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home