· Public charity
Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault
To unite people and organizations to promote a society free from sexual violence and to meet the diverse needs of survivors.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $307,716 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $322,389 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,673 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $243k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST SA | $191,200 |
| MONSOON UNITED ASIAN WOMEN | $51,542 |
| RAPE VICTIM ADVOCACY PROGRAM | $32,647 |
| AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES | $20,327 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY8× · 2017–2024 · $965k · revenue +947% · 45% of their budget
- NCNorth Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $848k · revenue +75%
- RTRESPECT TOGETHER7× · 2017–2023 · $442k · revenue +3%
Funded once
National Network to End Domestic Violence Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…
CSAJ is a national organization dedicated to enhancing advocacy for survivors of intimate partner violence. We develop and promote advocacy approaches that remove systemic barriers enhance organizational responses and improve professional…
The purpose of the illinois coalition against sexual assault is two-fold: to end sexual assault violence and to alleviate the suffering of sexual assault victims. to accomplish these goals, icasa advocates for public policy that prevents…
The Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault is a statewide coalition driving transformative culture change to address sexual violence through advocacy, prevention, racial justice, and systems change. We envision a world free of sexual…
To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.
Crime victim advocacy center's mission is to pursue a definition of justice which includes the victim. the center serves victims of all types of crime by providing a wide range of services such as counseling, advocacy, and offering…
To engage all people in a movement to change the social and political systems that perpetuate violence against women. we do this through education, advocacy and quality services.
The advocacy center of winona's mission is to end domestic and sexual violence in winona county.
To provide support, guidance and education to men, women and children to promote a life free of domestic and sexual violence.
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amani Community Service and the most unlike its peers is North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY ↗
- Who funds North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc ↗
- Who funds RESPECT TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA INDIAN WOMEN'S SEXUAL ASSUALT COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COALITION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT P ↗
- Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS-IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds NIAD CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AN ↗
- Who funds LATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER ↗
- Who funds CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA ↗
- Who funds THRIVE TOGETHER TODAY INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL CONCERN INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN ↗
- Who funds National Network to End Domestic Violence Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.