· Public charity
Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence
To engage all people in a movement to change the social and political systems that perpetuate violence against women.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $17,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $125,672 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $108,672 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WAYPOINT SERVICES | $17,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWAYPOINT SERVICES6× · 2019–2024 · $89k · revenue +77%
- CICRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER2× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +33%
- FCFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC2× · 2017–2019 · $21k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- ZIZION INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +147%
- CACENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSAone grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +12%
- ASAREA SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide support, resources, and hope for a better future to persons affected by domestic abuse, sexual assault and other crisis.
To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.
We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
The mission of crisis intervention service (cis) is to provide persons affected by domestic violence, sexual assault and homicide with professional, confidential, 24-hour services including safety and support and to prevent violence in our…
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…
Building stronger communities, strengthening families, and empowering individuals through compassionate, life changing programs and mental health services.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
To provide mental health and counseling services in wyoming through stewardship, innovation and compassion
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
Delivering care that changes people's lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services and the most unlike its peers is Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds ZION INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA ↗
- Who funds AREA SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL CONCERN INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence?
Find your warmest path to Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.