How much did INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC grant in FY2024?

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC reported 13 grants totaling $395,376 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC based?

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC is based in CA.

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC does good and makes good by bringing the joy of giving to millions with high touch, white glove, and more effective methods for donors to make and manage their contributions to the charitable causes they are passionate about.

$395k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$81k

Largest

01What you fund

0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.

Religion$328kHealth$200kHuman Services$101kPhilanthropy$60kHousing & Shelter$60kRecreation & Sports$52kCrime & Legal$38kYouth Development$27kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$437k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

children

2022

foster adoptiveadoptive kinshipreligiousspecificcorporationorganizedgospel

2023

lotawarenessdown syndromegangstreetorangemissions

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k9 grants · $193k
$50k–250k2 grants · $131k

$18,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$80,858
THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PARIS INC$50,000
HITCHING POST MINISTRIES$32,000
FOR THE CHILDREN$32,000
MAE HOUSE$32,000
OCEANS CHURCH$21,016
TERI INC$18,000
TARA'S CHANCE THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOR ALL$16,000
PRECIOUS LIFE SHELTER INC$16,000
THE COLLABORATIVE COURTS FOUNDATION$15,569
SONGSHINE$10,000
RYANS REACH$9,200
GLOVES 4 GRIEF INC$5,690

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$452k · 5 repeat orgs$864k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$452k

$694k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+49%

Still filing today

80%

95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $171k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TI
TERI INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $68k · revenue +28%
RF
Royal Family Kids Inc dba FTC
2× · 2021–2024 · $47k · revenue +68%
TC
THE COLLABORATIVE COURTS FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $38k · revenue +125%

Funded once

PROVIDENCE MISSION HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $132k · revenue +32%
GF
GOGETTAZ FOR GOD INC
one grant, 2022 · $132k
M
MISSIONSME
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Children's Home Society of California

See schedule o the mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services

Orange County Rescue Mission Inc

To minister the love of Jesus Christ to the Least, the Last, and the Lost of our Community through the provision of assistance in the areas of guidance, counseling, education, job training, shelter, food, clothing, health care and…

Housing & Shelter

Disability Rights California

Drc defends, advances, and strengthens the rights & opportunities of people with disabilities.

Civil Rights

Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch funds & supports children's cancer research & provides education & resources to all those affected by children's cancer.

Health

Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement

Childrens Receiving Home

The Childrens Receiving Home of Sacramento is committed to positively impacting the lives of children, youth, and families affected by abuse, neglect, behavioral health issues, and trauma in California.

—

Catholic Charities of Orange County Inc

The mission of catholic charities of orange county is to provide service to people in need, promote their voice in society, and to call the church and all people to do the same.

Human Services

Children's Law Center of California

Children's law center of california's exempt purpose is to provide legal and related services to qualified persons who are parties to or at risk of becoming parties to dependency court proceedings. all persons accepted for representation…

—

Children's Hospital of Orange County

To nurture, advance and protect the health and well being of children.

Health

Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services

The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health

Ccri Inc

CCRI supports children, adults, and families touched by a disability. We inspire people to reach their full potential and we do not let a disability define who a person is. Our mission is to enhance and enrich the lives and learning of…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For the Children and the most unlike its peers is Rescue International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/35

the rest of the field

11%

3,181/28,264

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/34

Grantees still filing

31/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$516,536Religion$327,500Health$199,807Human Services$101,006Philanthropy$60,123Housing & Shelter$60,000Recreation & Sports$51,589

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA32.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · California Community Foundation · Orange County's United Way · Sisters of St Joseph · Decorative Arts Society · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Oneoc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Sempra Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE COLLABORATIVE COURTS FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 223941228 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE COLLABORATIVE COURTS FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Investors Philanthropic?

Find your warmest path to Investors Philanthropic through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Investors Philanthropic?

More from the funding graph

INVESTORS PHILANTHROPIC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Investors Philanthropic?

More from the funding graph