Skip to content
Intouch Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Intouch Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$199kReligion$114kHealth$93kPhilanthropy$92kPublic Benefit$68kAnimals$60kFood & Nutrition$45kHuman Services$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT USA$68,000
DIRECT RELIEF$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH$6,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$5,000
EMERALD MOUNTAIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY COACHING: $3k → 15%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $13k → 8%HOPE HEALS: $3k → 13%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $7k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $6k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $6k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $6k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $6k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $6k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $6k → 8%ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH: $1k → 8%FBC COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $500 → 18%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5k → 18%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Intouch Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Intouch Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 7 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +175% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
31

Total granted

$329k
$238k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+175%
+37%

Still filing today

57%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $188k · revenue +40%
  • OR
    One Roof Ecumenical Alliance O
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +175%
  • EC
    ELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +260%

Funded once

  • BD
    BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +37%
  • MO
    MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +6%
  • AA
    ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue ×36 · 37% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Medical Corporation

We, mercy medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. in the tradition of the sisters of mercy, we are committed to continuing the…

—
2
Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

—
3
Christian Mission Centers Inc

The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.

—
4
Refuge 1212 Inc

Red mountain grace is a not-for-profit organization dedicated as a place of refuge for out-of-town patients and caregivers that are receiving extended medical treatment. our foundation is in christ, our heart is for birmingham.

Health
5
African Children's Mission Inc

Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.

Religion
6
West African Mercy Ministries Inc

West african mercy ministries is a non-profit, faith-based organization that works in ghana, west africa. our mission is to glorify god and love jesus through mercy ministry. we see this happening as we contagiously champion compassionate…

International
7
Agape of Central Alabama Inc

As a ministry of jesus christ, agape's mission is that vulnerable and orphaned children find permanency in safe, nurturing families.

Human Services
8
Hope Haven Ministries Inc

To serve an unmet need in the region by first providing shelter for men and women who may be unable to find shelter at other facilities but also provide residents with a unique opportunity to develop and utilize fundamental life skills to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Operation Care Inc

Operation care is a christian ministry that seeks to provide for the physical, spiritual, emotional, and social well-being of people in need of a loving, compassionate environment in the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
10
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
11
But God Ministries

Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…

International
12
Rural Gospel & Medical Missions of India

During the fiscal year, the dispensaries continued to provide reduced medical treatment and medications to several thousand outpatients and a limited number of inpatients. laboratory tests are conducted by the medical staff. primary…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is One Roof Ecumenical Alliance O. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT USA INC: $68,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCEASTERN HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH: $35,667 · OtherEASTERN HILLS BAPTIST CHURCHMACOA: $13,950 · OtherMACOASALVATION ARMY: $11,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,667 · OtherHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $16,400 · OtherHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INCELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $8,000 · Other+19 more: $64,000 · Other+19 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $188,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSECENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $81,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL ALABA…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $6,400 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS F…One Roof Ecumenical Alliance O: $56,000 · Human ServicesOne Roof E…UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITED MET…THE SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER IN: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE SAMARI…Family Coaching Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesHope Heals Inc: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $50,000 · HealthMEDICAL OU…ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS: $16,000 · HealthALABAMA AS…JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthJACKSON HO…BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $60,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG R…THE GREAT COMMISSION -- INDIA MINISTRIES: $10,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPE: $5,000 · International+1 more: $1,066 · International
Other$228,084Religion$188,000Philanthropy$87,400Human Services$71,500Health$71,000Animals$60,000International$36,066

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $188,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $81,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $68,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOne Roof Ecumenical Alliance O: $56,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $16,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS: $16,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetTHE GREAT COMMISSION -- INDIA MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF MONTGOMERY INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER IN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Coaching Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHope Heals Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $1,066 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERALD MOUNTAIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFBC COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kiwanis Club of Montg…Arthur M Britton Foun…The Daniel Foundation…B Stephen Schloss Fou…Gordy-Mead-Britton Fo…The Hobbs FoundationAlabama Power Foundat…Ruth Lee Charitable T…The S Adam Schloss Fo…The J K Lowder Family…Central Alabama Commu…Alfa Foundation
Kiwanis Club of Montgomery Foundation IncAL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kiwanis Club of Montgomery Foundation Inc · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · B Stephen Schloss Foundation · Gordy-Mead-Britton Foundation · The Hobbs Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Ruth Lee Charitable Trust · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc · The J K Lowder Family Foundation · Central Alabama Community Foundation Inc · Alfa Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Intouch Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Intouch Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Intouch Inc?

Find your warmest path to Intouch Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Intouch’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home