· Community foundation
Central Alabama Community Foundation Inc
Solicit contributions and disburse funds to tax-exempt organizations
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of CENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 59 grants below total $8,460,787 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,113,882 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $653,095 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $211k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $449k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
- $250k+1 grant · $7.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 135 GRANTS FROM DONOR ADVISED FUNDS MAINTAINED BY CACF | $7,665,175 |
| MONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION | $85,389 |
| MONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| CHILD PROTECT | $48,882 |
| MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES | $34,516 |
| FAMILY SUNSHINE CENTER | $28,528 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RIVER REGION | $24,512 |
| SOUTHEASTERN DIABETES EDUCATION SERVICES | $23,200 |
| SHORTER FIRE AUXILIARY | $22,000 |
| HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES | $21,000 |
| ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL | $20,408 |
| MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN MONTGOMERY | $19,662 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER CENTRAL ALABAMA | $16,774 |
| IMPACT ALABAMA | $15,000 |
| WOMEN OF REFINED GOLD | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $466k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
69 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +21%
- MMMONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION5× · 2018–2024 · $122k · revenue +3%
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER CENTRAL ALABAMA7× · 2017–2024 · $102k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- FFFISHERS FARM CORPORATIONone grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue -28%
- LCLOWNDES COUNTY COMMUNITY LIFE CENTERone grant, 2022 · $17k
- ALAMERICAN LEGION CHARLES L MARTIN POST 1948one grant, 2023 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Social services
Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.
The mission of the Arc of Tuscaloosa County is to provide activities to persons residing in Tuscaloosa County who have developmental or intellectual disabilities, which enable the individual to maintain previously acquired skills/behaviors…
To provide exceptional services, education, outreach, and advocacy so that people with disabilities can live, work and play in our communities.
To educate, empower, and improve services for mental health consumers in the state of alabama.
To train, educate, and gather community leaders to improve the welfare of the montgomery, alabama community
Strengthens families and serve sexual assault victims
To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers
Serving people with intellectual and/or other developmental disabilities and their families.
To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Jesse Parkhurst Guzman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN DIABETES EDUCATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds THATS MY CHILD ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND MONTGOMERY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUTTERFLY BRIDGE CHILD ADVOCACY CEN ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Child Protect Inc ↗
- Who funds KID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds Bridge Builders Alabama ↗
- Who funds INGRAM STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC ↗
- Who funds Alabama Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN MONTGOMERY ↗
- Who funds SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE TO HOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Impact America ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY INC ↗
- Who funds North Valley Knights Booster Club ↗
- Who funds THE NOAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AID TO INMATE MOTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds OSTARA INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social Services of Montgomery ↗
- Who funds FBC COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Kiwanis Club of Montgomery Foundation Inc · Junior League of Montgomery Inc · Alfa Foundation · River Region United Way · Alabama Civil Justice Foundation · The J K Lowder Family Foundation · Gordy-Mead-Britton Foundation · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · Working Woman's Home Association Inc · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Central Alabama Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.