· Private foundation
Intouch Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TURNING POINT USA | $68,000 |
| DIRECT RELIEF | $10,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $10,000 |
| ONE ROOF ECUMENICAL ALLIANCE OUTREACH | $6,000 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $5,000 |
| EMERALD MOUNTAIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Intouch Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +175% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE3× · 2022–2024 · $188k · revenue +40%
- OROne Roof Ecumenical Alliance O9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +175%
- ECELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC2× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +260%
Funded once
- BDBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +37%
- MOMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +6%
- AAALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue ×36 · 37% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We, mercy medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. in the tradition of the sisters of mercy, we are committed to continuing the…
To serve people, build community, pursue justice.
The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.
Red mountain grace is a not-for-profit organization dedicated as a place of refuge for out-of-town patients and caregivers that are receiving extended medical treatment. our foundation is in christ, our heart is for birmingham.
Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.
West african mercy ministries is a non-profit, faith-based organization that works in ghana, west africa. our mission is to glorify god and love jesus through mercy ministry. we see this happening as we contagiously champion compassionate…
As a ministry of jesus christ, agape's mission is that vulnerable and orphaned children find permanency in safe, nurturing families.
To serve an unmet need in the region by first providing shelter for men and women who may be unable to find shelter at other facilities but also provide residents with a unique opportunity to develop and utilize fundamental life skills to…
Operation care is a christian ministry that seeks to provide for the physical, spiritual, emotional, and social well-being of people in need of a loving, compassionate environment in the name of jesus christ.
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…
During the fiscal year, the dispensaries continued to provide reduced medical treatment and medications to several thousand outpatients and a limited number of inpatients. laboratory tests are conducted by the medical staff. primary…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is One Roof Ecumenical Alliance O. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds One Roof Ecumenical Alliance O ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT COMMISSION -- INDIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MONTGOMERY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER IN ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Family Coaching Inc ↗
- Who funds Hope Heals Inc ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kiwanis Club of Montgomery Foundation Inc · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · B Stephen Schloss Foundation · Gordy-Mead-Britton Foundation · The Hobbs Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Ruth Lee Charitable Trust · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc · The J K Lowder Family Foundation · Central Alabama Community Foundation Inc · Alfa Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Intouch Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Intouch Inc?
Find your warmest path to Intouch Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.