· Public charity
International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading Foundation
Support individuals and institutions that promote the advancement of commerical aviation and humanitarianism.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $176,372 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $763,671 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $587,299 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AIRLINK INC | $80,000 |
| OPAS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL AVIATION HALL OF FAME | $10,000 |
| SAN DIEGO AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| INTREPID MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| YOUTH AVIATION ADVENTURE | $10,000 |
| WE WERE ONCE THEM | $10,000 |
| PINHEAD INSTITUTE INC | $8,272 |
| AIRSERV INTERNATIONAL | $8,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL AVIATION WOMENS ASSOCIATION | $7,850 |
| HAITI AIR AIMBULANCE SERVICE INC | $7,000 |
| PARTNERS FOR ANDEAN COMMUNTIY HEALTH | $5,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $397k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $102k to organizations and $294k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GRANTS · SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS
Stated purpose: GRANTS · SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS
Stated purpose: GRANTS · SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS
Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 19% of International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIAIRLINK INC6× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +399%
- EAEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC4× · 2018–2023 · $144k · revenue +69%
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC3× · 2018–2020 · $139k · revenue +585%
Funded once
- PTPathways to Aviationone grant, 2017 · $75k
PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +12%- MAMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…
The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…
To advance the arts, sciences, and technology of aeronautics and astronautics and to nurture and promote the professionalism of those engaged in these pursuits. the institute encourages original research, fosters dissemination of new…
The mission of the sac museum is to celebrate our heritage, preserve our artifacts, and inspire learning.
Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.
To advance the art, sport, and science of aviation and space flight by fostering opportunities to participate fully in the aviation activities and by promoting public understanding of the importance of aviation and space flight in the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Airlink Inc and the most unlike its peers is Haiti Air Ambulance Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AIRLINK INC ↗
- Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Air Serv International Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN AVIATION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Pathways to Aviation ↗
- Who funds INTREPID MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Lewis University ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC ↗
- Who funds OPAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR ANDEAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY AIR INC ↗
- Who funds Aviation Hall of Fame ↗
- Who funds AIR CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE WOMENS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds North Country Life Flight Inc ↗
- Who funds VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AVIATION ADVENTURE ↗
- Who funds Museum of Aviation at Robins AFB Georgia Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Pinhead Institute ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE NINETY-NINES INC ↗
- Who funds HILLER AVIATION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE VIRGINIA AIR & SPACE CENTER ↗
- Who funds STEM Santa Fe ↗
- Who funds HAITI AIR AMBULANCE SERVICE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Embraer Foundation Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.